Majmu' al-FatawaIbn Taimiya

[Shaykh ʿAlam al-Dīn reported that the Shaykh—may Allah sanctify his soul—said at the gathering of the sultan’s deputy, al-Afram, when asked about his creed, having brought his creed, “al-Wāsitiyyah”: “I wrote this some seven years ago, before the Tatars came to Syria.” It was then read aloud at the gathering.

ʿAlam al-Dīn further reported that the Shaykh said:

“The reason I wrote it was that one of the judges of Wāsit, a man of virtue and religious devotion, complained of the people’s plight in their lands under Tatar rule: the prevalence of ignorance and injustice] (*) and the fading away of religion and knowledge. He asked me to write a creed for him. I told him, ‘People have already written down the creeds of the imams of the Sunnah.’ But he persisted in his request, saying, ‘I want only a creed that you yourself write.’ So I wrote this creed for him while sitting after the ʿAsr prayer.

“The emir then signalled to his scribe, who read it aloud to those present, word for word. One of them objected to my statement in it:

‘Part of faith in Allah is to believe in what He has described Himself with and what His Messenger has described Him with, without distortion or negation, without specifying how His attributes are or likening them to those of creation.’

“What he meant was that this rules out figurative reinterpretation—that is, diverting an expression from its apparent meaning—whether obligatory or permissible.

(*) Shaykh Nāsir ibn Hamad al-Fahd states (p. 25): “‘Alam al-Dīn is al-Birzālī, Muhammad ibn al-Qāsim, the renowned hāfiz (hadith master), who died in 739. He has a well-known chronicle from which Ibn ‘Abd al-Hādī—may Allah have mercy on him—quotes in his biography of Shaykh al-Islām. Al-Dhahabī’s concluding remarks indicate that the original account was taken from one of his chronicles, but I have not found it among the materials available to me.”
[نَقَلَ الشَّيْخُ عَلَمُ الدِّينِ: أَنَّ الشَّيْخَ - قَدَّسَ اللَّهُ رُوحَهُ - قَالَ: - فِي مَجْلِسِ نَائِبِ السَّلْطَنَةِ الأفرم - لَمَّا سَأَلَهُ عَنْ اعْتِقَادِهِ وَكَانَ الشَّيْخُ أَحْضَرَ عَقِيدَتَهُ " الواسطية " قَالَ - هَذِهِ كَتَبْتهَا مِنْ نَحْوِ سَبْعِ سِنِينَ قَبْلَ مَجِيءِ التَّتَارِ إلَى الشَّامِ؛ فَقُرِئَتْ فِي الْمَجْلِسِ. ثُمَّ نَقَلَ عَلَمُ الدِّينِ عَنْ الشَّيْخِ أَنَّهُ قَالَ: كَانَ سَبَبُ كِتَابَتِهَا أَنَّ بَعْضَ قُضَاةِ وَاسِطٍ مِنْ أَهْلِ الْخَيْرِ وَالدِّينِ شَكَا مَا النَّاسُ فِيهِ - بِبِلَادِهِمْ فِي دَوْلَةِ التتر - مِنْ غَلَبَةِ الْجَهْلِ وَالظُّلْمِ] (*) وَدُرُوسِ الدِّينِ وَالْعِلْمِ؛ وَسَأَلَنِي أَنْ أَكْتُبَ لَهُ " عَقِيدَةً " فَقُلْت لَهُ: قَدْ كَتَبَ النَّاسُ عَقَائِدَ أَئِمَّةِ السُّنَّةِ؛ فَأَلَحَّ فِي السُّؤَالِ، وَقَالَ: مَا أُحِبُّ إلَّا عَقِيدَةً تَكْتُبُهَا أَنْتَ. فَكَتَبْت لَهُ هَذِهِ الْعَقِيدَةَ - وَأَنَا قَاعِدٌ بَعْدَ الْعَصْرِ فَأَشَارَ الْأَمِيرُ لِكَاتِبِهِ فَقَرَأَهَا عَلَى الْحَاضِرِينَ حَرْفًا حَرْفًا فَاعْتَرَضَ بَعْضُهُمْ عَلَى قَوْلِي فِيهَا: وَمِنْ الْإِيمَانِ بِاَللَّهِ الْإِيمَانُ بِمَا وَصَفَ بِهِ نَفْسَهُ، وَوَصَفَهُ بِهِ رَسُولُهُ: مِنْ غَيْرِ تَحْرِيفٍ وَلَا تَعْطِيلٍ وَلَا تَكْيِيفٍ وَلَا تَمْثِيلٍ. وَمَقْصُودُهُ أَنَّ هَذَا يَنْفِي التَّأْوِيلَ الَّذِي هُوَ صَرْفُ اللَّفْظِ عَنْ ظَاهِرِهِ: إمَّا وُجُوبًا وَإِمَّا جَوَازًا.
(*) قال الشيخ ناصر بن حمد الفهد (ص ٢٥): وعلم الدين هو البرزالي محمد بن القاسم الحافظ المعروف (ت ٧٣٩)، وله تاريخ معروف ينقل عنه ابن عبد الهادي رحمه الله في ترجمة شيخ الإسلام، وكلام الذهبي الأخير يدل على أن أصل الكلام منقول عن أحد تواريخه، ولم أجد ذلك فيما يين يدي.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies