Majmu' al-FatawaIbn Taimiya

al-Intisār (The Defence) a statement from al-Shāfiʿī like the one I had cited. Then, at the third gathering, Ibn al-Wakīl raised the matter again.

Shaykh Kamāl al-Dīn said to Sadr al-Dīn ibn al-Wakīl: “At that gathering, you told Shaykh Taqī al-Dīn that whoever says that a single letter of the Quran is created is a disbeliever.” He repeated this several times. At this point, Shaykh Kamāl al-Dīn became extremely angry, raised his voice, and said:

“This declares our fellow Ashʿarī theologians disbelievers—those who say that the letters of the Quran are created, such as Imām al-Haramayn and others. We will not tolerate our fellows being declared disbelievers.”

Ibn al-Wakīl denied having said that, saying: “I did not say that. I only said that whoever denies a single letter of the Quran has disbelieved.”

Those present rejected his denial and said: “What you said was precisely such-and-such.” They also said: “You should not make a statement and then retract it.”

One of them said: “He did not say this.” Then, when they distorted the account, he said: “We did not hear him say this.” Eventually, the sultan’s deputy said: “One man lies, and another bears witness!”

Shaykh Kamāl al-Dīn, still angry, turned to the Shāfiʿī chief judge, Najm al-Dīn, urgently appealing for his support against Ibn al-Wakīl for having declared his fellows disbelievers.

Judge Najm al-Dīn said: “I did not hear this.”

Shaykh Kamāl al-Dīn became angry and said something whose exact wording I did not retain, but whose meaning was that this was a slight upon al-Shāfiʿī and a disgrace to them: their leading scholars were being declared disbelievers, yet no one came to their defence.

I did not hear what Shaykh Kamāl al-Dīn said concerning Judge Najm al-Dīn. Other attendees were asked whether they had heard him say anything about the judge. They said: “No.” But the judge believed

الِانْتِصَارِ عَنْ الشَّافِعِيِّ مِثْلَ مَا نَقَلْت فَلَمَّا كَانَ فِي الْمَجْلِسِ الثَّالِثِ: أَعَادَ ابْنُ الْوَكِيلِ الْكَلَامَ فِي ذَلِكَ. فَقَالَ الشَّيْخُ كَمَالُ الدِّينِ لِصَدْرِ الدِّينِ بْنِ الْوَكِيلِ: قَدْ قُلْت فِي ذَلِكَ الْمَجْلِسِ لِلشَّيْخِ تَقِيِّ الدِّينِ: أَنَّهُ مَنْ قَالَ إنَّ حَرْفًا مِنْ الْقُرْآنِ مَخْلُوقٌ فَهُوَ كَافِرٌ، فَأَعَادَهُ مِرَارًا فَغَضِبَ هُنَا الشَّيْخُ كَمَالُ الدِّينِ غَضَبًا شَدِيدًا وَرَفَعَ صَوْتَهُ. وَقَالَ: هَذَا يُكَفِّرُ أَصْحَابَنَا الْمُتَكَلِّمِينَ الْأَشْعَرِيَّةَ الَّذِينَ يَقُولُونَ: إنَّ حُرُوفَ الْقُرْآنِ مَخْلُوقَةٌ مِثْلُ إمَامِ الْحَرَمَيْنِ وَغَيْرِهِ وَمَا نَصْبِرُ عَلَى تَكْفِيرِ أَصْحَابِنَا. فَأَنْكَرَ ابْنُ الْوَكِيلِ أَنَّهُ قَالَ ذَلِكَ. وَقَالَ: مَا قُلْت ذَلِكَ، وَإِنَّمَا قُلْت أَنَّ مَنْ أَنْكَرَ حَرْفًا مِنْ الْقُرْآنِ فَقَدْ كَفَرَ. فَرَدَّ ذَلِكَ عَلَيْهِ الْحَاضِرُونَ وَقَالُوا: مَا قُلْت إلَّا كَذَا وَكَذَا وَقَالُوا: مَا يَنْبَغِي لَك أَنْ تَقُولَ قَوْلًا وَتَرْجِعَ عَنْهُ. وَقَالَ بَعْضُهُمْ: مَا قَالَ هَذَا. فَلَمَّا حَرَّفُوا: قَالَ مَا سَمِعْنَاهُ قَالَ هَذَا، حَتَّى قَالَ نَائِبُ السُّلْطَانِ: وَاحِدٌ يَكْذِبُ وَآخَرُ يَشْهَدُ وَالشَّيْخُ كَمَالُ الدِّينِ مُغْضَبٌ فَالْتَفَتَ إلَى قَاضِي الْقُضَاةِ نَجْمِ الدِّينِ الشَّافِعِيِّ يَسْتَصْرِخُهُ لِلِانْتِصَارِ عَلَى ابْنِ الْوَكِيلِ حَيْثُ كَفَّرَ أَصْحَابَهُ. فَقَالَ الْقَاضِي نَجْمُ الدِّينِ: مَا سَمِعْت هَذَا. فَغَضِبَ الشَّيْخُ كَمَالُ الدِّينِ وَقَالَ كَلَامًا لَمْ أَضْبِطْ لَفْظَهُ إلَّا أَنَّ مَعْنَاهُ: أَنَّ هَذَا غَضَاضَةٌ عَلَى الشَّافِعِيِّ وَعَارٌ عَلَيْهِمْ أَنَّ أَئِمَّتَهُمْ يُكَفَّرُونَ وَلَا يُنْتَصَرُ لَهُمْ. وَلَمْ أَسْمَعْ مِنْ الشَّيْخِ كَمَالِ الدِّينِ مَا قَالَ فِي حَقِّ الْقَاضِي نَجْمِ الدِّينِ وَاسْتَثْبَتَ غَيْرِي مِمَّنْ حَضَرَ هَلْ سَمِعَ مِنْهُ فِي حَقِّهِ شَيْئًا؟ فَقَالُوا: لَا. لَكِنَّ الْقَاضِيَ اعْتَقَدَ

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies