Al-Hisba fi al-IslamIbn Taimiya

Section: Financial Discretionary Penalties

Imposing taʿzīr by way of financial measures—that is, punishments that target a person’s property—is also sanctioned in certain specific situations. This is the well-known view transmitted from Mālik, the view of Aḥmad in a number of cases about which there is no dispute among his followers and in others where some debate exists, and one of the reported opinions of al-Shāfiʿī. Although the jurists differ over the details, the Sunnah of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) clearly attests to its legitimacy. He permitted the confiscation of the personal effects of a man who hunted within the sanctuary of Madinah after catching him; he ordered that wine jars be smashed and their skins torn open; and he instructed ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿUmar to burn two saffron-dyed garments. When Ibn ʿUmar asked, “Shall I wash them instead?” he replied, “No—burn them.”

Likewise, on the day of Khaybar he commanded that the vessels containing donkey meat be broken. Later, when the Companions sought permission merely to spill out the contents, he allowed it: “When he saw the pots boiling with donkey flesh, he ordered that they be broken and the contents poured away. They said, ‘Could we not simply pour it out and wash the pots?’ He said, ‘Do so.’” This indicates that either course was acceptable, for the punishment itself was not obligatory.

Other precedents are his demolition of the Mosque of Harm (Masjid al-Dirār); Moses’ burning of the calf that had been taken as a god; his doubling of the liability for anyone who stole property that had not been kept in a secure place; the report that the possessions of a soldier who had misappropriated booty were burned; and his depriving a killer of the spoils when he assaulted the commander without authorization. ʿUmar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb and ʿAlī ibn Abī Ṭālib likewise ordered the burning of premises where wine was sold; half the wealth of one who withheld the zakāt was to be taken; ʿUthmān ibn ʿAffān burned Qurʾān codices that differed from the master copy; and ʿUmar ibn

فصل: [التعزير المالي] و"التعزير بالعقوبات المالية" مشروع أيضًا في مواضع مخصوصة في مذهب مالك في المشهور عنه، ومذهب أحمد في مواضع بلا نزاع عنه، وفي مواضع فيها نزاع عنه، والشافعي في قول، وإن تنازعوا في تفصيل ذلك كما دلت عليه سنة رسول الله ﷺ في مثل إباحته سلب الذي يصطاد في حرم المدينة لما وجده، ومثل أمره بكسر دنان الخمر وشق ظروفه، ومثل أمره عبد الله بن عمر بحرق الثوبين المعصفرين، وقال له: أغسلهما؟ قال: " لا بل احرقهما". وأمره لهم يوم خيبر بكسر الأوعية التي فيها لحوم الحمر. ثم لما استأذنوه في الإراقة أذن، فإنه "لما رأى القدور تفور بلحم الحمر أمر بكسرها وإراقة ما فيها، فقالوا: أفلا نريقها ونغسلها؟ فقال: "افعلوا". فدل ذلك على جواز الأمرين؛ لأن عقوبة ذلك لم تكن واجبة. ومثل هدمه لمسجد الضرار ومثل تحريق موسى للعجل المتخذ إلهًا، ومثل تضعيفه ﷺ الغرم على من سرق من غير حرز، ومثل ما روى من إحراق متاع الغال، ومن حرمان القاتل سلبه لما اعتدى على الأمير. ومثل أمر عمر بن الخطاب وعلي بن أبي طالب بتحريق المكان الذي يباع فيه الخمر، ومثل أخذ شطر مال مانع الزكاة، ومثل تحريق عثمان بن عفان المصاحف المخالفة للإمام، وتحريق عمر بن

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies