that counters hatred or its cause, arising either from pleasure in the act, desire for compensation, or fear that induces willingness in the person under compulsion. In that case, he is like someone acting out of desire or fear, not someone who does not act.

This is why Islamic law treats a consenting woman as guilty of fornication, and likewise a male upon whom the act is committed. As Allah Most High says:

“A fornicator marries none but a woman guilty of fornication or a polytheistic woman, and a woman guilty of fornication is married by none but a fornicator or a polytheistic man. And that is forbidden to the believers.”
Surah al-Nūr, 3

If someone claimed that the person upon whom the act is committed is not acting when he exhibits neither willingness nor movement in the act, this would not be accepted. Rather, one should say: were it not for the presence of a willingness that produces the dislike that entails resistance, he would not be acting.

The jurists have discussed whether the ritual purity of a person who is touched is invalidated like that of the person touching. There are two positions on this, both transmitted from Ahmad. They likewise discussed whether a woman with whom intercourse takes place during Ramadan