Al-IstiqamaIbn Taimiya

views held by Dirār ibn ʿAmr and groups of speculative theologians who professed to support Ahl al-Sunnah on the question of seeing Allah—even though what they affirm is of the same kind as what the Muʿtazilah and the Dirāriyyah denied. Their disagreement with those groups is merely verbal, whereas their disagreement with Ahl al-Sunnah is substantive. For this reason, Bishr al-Marīsī and others like him interpreted the vision of Allah in much the same way as these theologians.

The point here is that some who affirm the vision of Allah denied that the believer experiences bliss through seeing his Lord itself. They argued that there is no affinity between the created and the Eternal, as the scholar Abū al-Maʿālī al-Juwaynī stated in his al-Risālah al-Nizāmiyyah, and as Abū al-Wafāʾ ibn ʿAqīl stated in some of his works.

ذَلِك من الاقوال الَّتِي ذهب اليها ضرار بن عَمْرو وَطَوَائِف من اهل الْكَلَام المنتسبين الى نصر اهل السّنة فِي مَسْأَلَة الرُّؤْيَة وان كَانَ مَا يثبتونه من جنس مَا نفته الْمُعْتَزلَة والضرارية والنزاع بَينهم لَفْظِي ونزاعهم مَعَ اهل السّنة معنوي وَلِهَذَا كَانَ بشر المريسي وامثاله يفسرون الرُّؤْيَة بِنَحْوِ من تَفْسِير هَؤُلَاءِ وَالْمَقْصُود هُنَا ان مثبتة الرُّؤْيَة مِنْهُم من انكر ان يكون الْمُؤمن ينعم بِنَفس رُؤْيَته ربه قَالُوا لِأَنَّهُ لَا مُنَاسبَة بَين الْمُحدث وَالْقَدِيم كَمَا ذكر ذَلِك الاستاذ ابو الْمَعَالِي الْجُوَيْنِيّ فِي الرسَالَة النظامية وكما ذكره ابو الْوَفَاء بن عقيل فِي بعض كتبه

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies