Al-IstiqamaIbn Taimiya

they understood it to mean: that he had said, “Contentment means that you neither ask Allah for Paradise nor seek His protection from the Fire.”

Abū Sulaymān’s actual statement does not indicate that he was content with that, but rather that he was resolved to be content with it. We know that such resolve would not endure, but would collapse; that it would have been better to leave such words unsaid; and that they call for correction, just as the claims of Sumnūn and Ruwaym and other such claims did. Nevertheless, there is a vast difference between his statement and the one attributed to him. The latter implies that anyone who asks Allah for Paradise and seeks His protection from the Fire is not content. There is a difference between saying, “If such-and-such were done to me, I would be content,” and saying, “Only someone who neither seeks good nor flees evil can be content.”

From this and other considerations, it is clear that Shaykh Abū Sulaymān was too eminent to

فهمه من الْمَعْنى انه قَالَ الرِّضَا ان لَا تسْأَل الله الْجنَّة وَلَا تستعيذه من النَّار وَتلك الْكَلِمَة الَّتِي قَالَهَا ابو سُلَيْمَان مَعَ انها لَا تدل على رِضَاهُ بذلك وَلَكِن تدل على عَزمَة بِالرِّضَا بذلك وَنحن نعلم ان ذَلِك الْعَزْم لَا يسْتَمر بل يَنْفَسِخ وان مثل هَذِه الْكَلِمَة كَانَ تَركهَا احسن من قَوْلهَا وانها مستدركة كَمَا استدركه دَعْوَى سمنون ورويم وَغير ذَلِك فَإِن بَين هَذِه الْكَلِمَة وَبَين تِلْكَ فرقا عَظِيما فان تِلْكَ الْكَلِمَة مضمونها ان من سَأَلَ الله الْجنَّة واستعاذه من النَّار لَا يكون رَاضِيا وَفرق بَين من يَقُول انا اذا فعل بِي كَذَا كنت رَاضِيا وَبَين من يَقُول لَا يكون رَاضِيا الا من لَا يطْلب خيرا وَمن لَا يهرب من شَرّ وَبِهَذَا وَغَيره يعلم ان الشَّيْخ ابا سُلَيْمَان كَانَ اجل من ان

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies