“Darrāj narrates many objectionable reports.”

That is the correct view. Al-Dhahabī included him in al-Mīzān and cited the statements of those who declared him weak—and they are the majority. He then listed some of the hadiths for which he had been criticized, including a report he narrated with a chain traced back to the Prophet:

“Remember Allah until people say, ‘He is mad!’”

Al-Hāfiz said in al-Taqrīb: “Generally truthful, but his narrations from Abū al-Haytham contain weakness.”

This means that, in his view, Darrāj’s hadiths from narrators other than Abū al-Haytham are acceptable. Allah knows best.

19—(And he says: “No servant acquires wealth unlawfully, gives it in charity, and has it accepted from him; nor does he spend any of it and receive blessing therein; nor does he leave it behind him without it becoming his provision for the Fire. Indeed, Allah Most High does not erase an evil deed with another evil deed, but He erases an evil deed with a good deed. What is impure does not erase what is impure.” Narrated by Ahmad and others from Ibn Mas‘ūd). p. 34

Weak. Ahmad (1/387) and Ibn ‘Asākir in Tārīkh Dimashq (15/121/1) narrated it through al-Sabbāh ibn Muhammad, from Murra al-Hamdānī, from ‘Abd Allah ibn Mas‘ūd. Abū Nu‘aym also narrated it in al-Hilya (4/166) through Imam Ahmad and said: “No one narrated it from Murra except al-Sabbāh.”

I say: He is weak, as al-Hāfiz stated in al-Taqrīb. He also said: “Ibn Hibbān went too far in criticizing him.”