Muqaddima fi Usul al-HadithAbd al-Haqq al-Dehlawi

encompass all the authentic material; rather, their compilations are confined to sound reports. Even the hadiths they themselves deemed sound and that met their own standards were not all cited in their two books—let alone the authentic reports known to other scholars.

Al-Bukhari said, “I have included in my book only what is sahih, yet I have left out much that is authentic.” Muslim likewise stated, “The hadiths I have set down in this book are sound, but I do not claim that whatever I have left out is weak.”

It follows that their decisions to omit or include a report must have rested on some principle of selection, whether related to degrees of soundness or to other scholarly purposes.

Al-Hakim’s Mustadrak

Al-Hakim Abu ‘Abd Allah al-Naysaburi compiled a work he called al-Mustadrak, intending thereby to supply in this book the authentic reports that al-Bukhari and Muslim had not included.

يستوعبا الصِّحَاح كلهَا بل هما منحصران فِي الصِّحَاح والصحاح الَّتِي عِنْدهمَا وعَلى شَرطهمَا أَيْضا لم يورداها فِي كِتَابَيْهِمَا فضلا عَمَّا عِنْد غَيرهمَا قَالَ البُخَارِيّ مَا أوردت فِي كتابي هَذَا إِلَّا مَا صَحَّ وَلَقَد تركت كثيرا من الصِّحَاح وَقَالَ مُسلم الَّذِي أوردت فِي هَذَا الْكتاب من الْأَحَادِيث صَحِيح وَلَا أَقُول أَن مَا تركت ضَعِيف وَلَا بُد أَن يكون فِي هَذَا التّرْك والإتيان وَجه تَخْصِيص الْإِيرَاد وَالتّرْك إِمَّا من جِهَة الصِّحَّة أَو من جِهَة مَقَاصِد أخر مُسْتَدْرك الْحَاكِم وَالْحَاكِم أَبُو عبد الله النَّيْسَابُورِي صنف كتابا سَمَّاهُ الْمُسْتَدْرك بِمَعْنى أَن مَا تَركه البُخَارِيّ وَمُسلم من الصِّحَاح أوردهُ فِي هَذَا الْكتاب

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies