Hidāyat al-ḤayārāIbn al-Qayyim

So when their jurists observed that the Torah contains no prohibition against eating the food of other nations except that of idol-worshippers, and that the Torah itself makes it plain that the ban on dining or socialising with them was only to prevent such contact from leading to intermarriage—and intermarriage might then draw a person away from his own faith into their religions (1) and into the worship of idols—and when they found all of this clearly stated in the Torah, they invented a book which they called Hilkat Sheḥitah (2), meaning “The Science of Slaughter.” In that treatise they laid upon their followers fetters and shackles that kept them so busy they forgot the humiliation, abasement, and disgrace in which they lived.

In it they ordered them (3) to inflate the animal’s lung until it was full of air and then to examine it (4) to see whether any air escaped through a tiny hole. If air did escape, they declared the meat forbidden; and if any parts of the lung were found stuck together, they would not eat it either.

They further commanded the inspector of the carcass to insert his hand into the animal’s belly and feel with his fingers; if he discovered the heart attached to the spine or to either side—even if the attachment were by a sinew as fine as a hair—they pronounced the meat unlawful, refused to eat it, and called it ṭurayfā.

In their usage this word means “impure and forbidden.” Yet this designation is an act of aggression on their part, for in their own language it signifies only an animal mauled by a beast of prey and has no other meaning. Likewise (5), in their Torah, when Joseph’s brothers brought his tunic stained with blood, Jacob said, in the course of his speech: “tārof …”

(1) Manuscript G reads: dinahum ("their religion"). (2) Manuscripts G and S read: sakhitan ("detested"). (3) Manuscript B reads: wa amaruhum ("and they commanded them"). (4) Manuscript S reads: yataammalunaha ("they contemplate it"), which is erroneous. (5) Manuscript D reads: walidhalika ("therefore").
فلما نظر فقهاؤهم إلى أن التوراة غير ناطقة بتحريم مآكل الأمم عليهم إلا عُبَّاد الأصنام، وصرَّحت التوراة بأن تحريم مؤاكلتهم ومخالطتهم خوف استدراج المخالطة إلى المناكحة، والمناكحةُ قد تستتبع الانتقالَ من دينهم إلى أديانهم (١)، وموافَقَتَهم في عبادة الأوثان. ووجدوا جميع هذا واضحًا في التوراة = اختلقوا كتابًا سموه "هلكت شحيطا" (٢). وتفسيره: علم الذباحة، ووضعوا في هذا الكتاب من الآصار والأغلال ما شغلوهم به عمَّا هم فيه من الذل والصَّغَار والخِزْي. فأمروهم (٣) فيه أن ينفخوا الرِّئةَ حتى يملؤوها هواء، ويتأملوها (٤) هل يخرج الهواء من ثُقْبٍ منها أم لا؟ فإن خرج منها الهواء: حرَّموه، وإن كانت بعض أطرافِ الرئة لاصقةً ببعض: لم يأكلوه. وأمروا الذي يتفقد الذبيحة أن يُدْخِل يده في بطن الذبيحة ويتأمل بأصابعه؛ فإن وَجَد القلبَ ملتصقًا إلى الظهر، أو أحد الجانبين -ولو كان الالتصاق بعرق دقيق كالشعرة-: حرَّموه ولم يأكلوه وسموه "طُرَيْفا". ومعنى هذه اللفظة عندهم أنه نجس حرام. وهذه التسمية عدوان منهم؛ فإنَّ معناها في لغتهم هي الفريسة التي يفترسها السَّبُع، ليس لها معنى في لغتهم سواه، وكذلك (٥) عندهم في التوراة أنَّ إخوة يوسف لما جاؤوا بقميصه ملطَّخًا بالدم قال يعقوب في جملة كلام: "طاروف
(١) في "غ": "دينهم". (٢) في "غ، ص": "سخيطا". (٣) في "ب": "وأمروهم". (٤) في "ص": "يتأملونها". وهو خطأ. (٥) في "د": "ولذلك".

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies