Al-Taqrīb wa-al-TaysīrAl-Nawawi

while the sound ruling on which practice has always rested is that it is permissible. This conclusion was decisively upheld by the ḥadīth masters al-Daraqutnī, Ibn ʿAqda, Abū Nuʿaym, and Abū al-Fatḥ Naṣr al-Maqdisī. Abū al-Fatḥ himself would transmit an ijāza on the basis of another ijāza and would sometimes string together as many as three. Anyone who narrates by virtue of such an authorization must scrutinize it carefully, lest he relate material that does not fall under its scope. Thus, if the ijāza concerns his teacher’s teacher—“I authorize you for whatever of my auditions you have verified”—and he then consults the auditions of that elder teacher, he may not narrate them from his own teacher on that elder’s authority until he knows for certain that his teacher has verified them as part of the elder’s auditions.

Sub-issue
Abū al-Ḥusayn Ibn Fāris said: The term ijāza is derived from jawāz al-māʾ, the water that is given to livestock or crops. One says istajaztuhu fa-ajāzani when someone waters your animals or your land; likewise, a seeker of knowledge receives knowledge from a scholar who “lets it flow” to him. On this basis one may say, “I granted so-and-so my auditions.” Those who regard ijāza as mere permission—which is the prevalent view—would phrase it, “I granted him permission to transmit my auditions.” If someone says, “I granted him my auditions,” the wording is understood as elliptical, like similar expressions. They further stated that an ijāza is only praiseworthy when the grantor knows exactly what he is authorizing and the recipient is a qualified scholar; some required this outright, and it is related from Mālik. Ibn ʿAbd al-Barr affirmed that the correct view is that it is valid only for one proficient in the discipline and with respect to a specific corpus whose chain of transmission is unambiguous. When the ijāza is issued in writing, it is recommended that the grantor also pronounce it orally; nevertheless, if he confines himself to writing while intending an ijāza, it remains valid. Allah knows best.

Section Four:
Munāwala (Hand-to-Hand Transmission)
This is of two kinds: one that is coupled with an ijāza and one that stands alone. The coupled form is, without qualification, the highest type of ijāza. One instance is when the shaykh hands the student his original audition or a verified copy and says, “This is my audition,” or, “my narration from so-and-so.”

به، والصحيح الذي عليه العمل جوازه، وبه قطع الحفاظ: الدارقطني، وابن عقدة، وأبو نعيم وأبو الفتح نصر المقدسي، وكان أبو الفتح يروي بالإجازة عن الإجازة، وربما والى بين ثلاث، وينبغي للراوي بها تأملها لئلا يروي ما لم يدخل تحتها، فإن كانت إجازة شيخ شيخه أجزت له ما صح عنده من سماعي فرأى سماع شيخ شيخه فليس له روايته عن شيخه عنه حتى يعرف أنه صح عند شيخه كونه من مسموعات شيخه. فرع قال أبو الحسين بن فارس: الإجازة مأخوذة من جواز الماء الذي تسقاه الماشية والحرث، يقال: استجزته فأجازني إذا أسقاك ماءً لماشيتك أو أرضك كذا طالب العلم علمه فيجيزه، فعلى هذا يجوز أن تقول أجزت فلاناً مسموعاتي، ومن جعل الإجازة إذناً وهو المعروف يقول: أجزت له رواية مسموعاتي، ومتى قال: أجزت له مسموعاتي فعلى الحذف كما في نظائره، قالوا: إنما تستحسن الإجازة إذا علم المجيز ما يجيز، وكان المجاز من أهل العلم، واشترطه بعضهم وحكي عن مالك، وقال ابن عبد البر: الصحيح أنها لا تجوز إلا لماهر بالصناعة في معين لا يشكل إسناده، وينبغي للمجيز كتابة أن يتلفظ بها فإن اقتصر على الكتابة مع قصد الإجازة صحت، والله أعلم. القسم الرابع: المناولة هي ضربان مقرونة بالإجازة، ومجردة، فالمقرونة أعلى أنواع الإجازة مطلقاً، ومن صورها أن يدفع الشيخ إلى الطالب أصل سماعه أو مقابلاً. ويقول: هذا سماعي أو روايتي عن فلان

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies