Al-Taqrīb wa-al-TaysīrAl-Nawawi

If he were instead to say, “I authorize so-and-so for such-and-such, should he wish to transmit it from me; or I authorize you, if you so wish, prefer, or desire,” the sounder opinion is that this is permissible.

Fifth category: authorization granted to someone who does not yet exist, as in the formula, “I authorize whoever will be born to so-and-so.” Later scholars differed as to its validity. Should the unborn person be coupled with someone already living—such as, “I authorize so-and-so and whoever will be born to him,” or, “I authorize you and your descendants, generation after generation”—it is even more worthy of acceptance. The latter wording was actually employed by the hadith scholar Abu Bakr ibn Abi Dawud; al-Khatib deemed the former valid and related that view from Ibn al-Farraʾ and Ibn ʿAmrūs. Qadi Abu al-Tayyib and Ibn al-Sabbagh, both Shafiʿis, rejected it, and that is the correct ruling to which one ought to adhere. As for an authorization granted to a child who has not yet reached the age of discernment, the sound position—affirmed categorically by Qadi Abu al-Tayyib and al-Khatib, contrary to some—holds it to be valid.

Sixth category: authorizing the transmission of material that the shaykh himself has not yet received in any fashion, with the understanding that the recipient may narrate it once the shaykh does receive it. Qadi ʿIyad said, “I have not seen anyone address this issue, though I have observed some later scholars practicing it.” He then reported that the judge of Cordoba, Abu al-Walid, forbade it, and ʿIyad added, “That is the correct view, and it is indeed the right ruling.” Accordingly, whoever wishes to narrate by virtue of a shaykh’s blanket authorization for all his auditions must make sure that the material in question had actually reached the shaykh before the authorization was issued. As for the statement, “I authorize you for whatever of my auditions has been—or will be—verified as sound in your estimation,” it is valid, and one may narrate whatever he has confirmed the shaykh heard prior to the authorization. This was the practice of al-Daraqutni and others.

Seventh category: authorizing material that one has received only by authorization, as in, “I authorize you for my authorizations.” Some scholars whose opinions carry little weight have disallowed this

ولو قال أجزت لفلان كذا إن شاء روايته عني، أو لك إن شئت أو أحببت أو أردت، فالأطهر جوازه. الضرب الخامس: الإجازة للمعدوم كأجزت لمن يولد لفلان، واختلف المتأخرون في صحتها فإن عطفه على موجود كأجزت لفلان ومن يولد له أو لك ولعقبك ما تناسلوا فأولى بالجواز، وفعل الثاني من المحدثين أبو بكر بن أبي داود، وأجاز الخطيب الأول، وحكاه عن ابن الفراء، وابن عمروس، وأبطلها القاضي أبو الطيب، وابن الصباغ: الشافعيان، وهو الصحيح الذي لا ينبغي غيره، وأما الإجازة للطفل الذي لا يميز فصحيحه على الصحيح الذي قطع به القاضي أبو الطيب، والخطيب خلافاً لبعضهم. الضرب السادس: إجازة ما لم يتحمله المجيز بوجه ليرويه المجاز إذا تحمله المجيز. قال القاضي عياض: لم أر من تكلم فيه، ورأيت بعض المتأخرين يصنعونه، ثم حكى عن قاضي قرطبة أبي الوليد منع ذلك، قال عياض: وهو الصحيح، وهذا هو الصواب، فعلى هذا يتعين على من أراد أن يروي عن شيخ أجاز له جميع مسموعاته أن يبحث حتى يعلم أن هذا ما تحمله شيخه قبل الإجازة، أما قوله أجزت لك ما صح أو يصح عندك من مسموعاتي فصحيح تجوز الرواية بما لما صح عنده سماعه له قبل الإجازة، وفعله الدارقطني وغيره. الضرب السابع: إجازة المجاز كأجزتك مجازاتي فمنعه بعض من لا يعتد

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies