Tafsir al-BaghawiAl-Baghawi

Uthman also said: “There are grammatical irregularities in the written Quran which the Arabs will rectify with their tongues.” He was asked, “Will you not change it?” He replied, “Leave it as it is, for it neither makes lawful what is unlawful nor makes unlawful what is lawful.” (1)

The majority of the Companions and scholars held that it is correct, though they differed over its explanation. It was said that it is in the accusative as an expression of praise. It was also said that it is in the accusative through an implied verb, the sense being: “I mean those who establish prayer,” and they are the ones who give zakah. It was further said that its grammatical position is genitive.

They differed over the manner of explaining this. Some said that its meaning is: “But those firmly grounded in knowledge among them, and those who establish prayer.” Others said that its meaning is: “They believe in what has been revealed to you and to those who establish prayer.” Then His words, “and those who give zakah,” return to the initial syntactic coordination: “and those who believe in Allah and the Last Day—those We shall give a tremendous reward.” Hamzah recited it, “He will give them,” with the letter yā’, while the others recited it with the letter nūn: “We shall give them.”

(1) Ibn al-Anbari states in his book al-Radd ala man khalafa Mushaf Uthman (Refutation of Those Who Opposed Uthman's Codex): “The reports narrated from Uthman concerning this matter do not constitute proof, because their chains are disconnected. Nor could any sound mind accept that Uthman, the imam of the community, its leader and exemplar in his time, would unite them upon the master codex, then discover a defect in it and observe errors in its script without correcting them. By Allah, no fair-minded and discerning person could imagine this of him, nor believe that he left an error in the Book for those after him to correct, when the course of those who came after him was to follow his orthography and abide by its ruling. Whoever claims that Uthman meant by his statement, ‘I see in it lahn (a grammatical error) . . .,’ that he saw an error in its written form which, when recited correctly, would not corrupt or alter the words or disrupt their grammar, is mistaken. For writing indicates pronunciation: whoever commits lahn in his writing commits it in his speech. Uthman would not have left any corruption in the spelling of the Quranic words, whether in writing or pronunciation. It is well known that he continually studied the Quran, had mastered its wording precisely, and approved what was written in the codices dispatched to the various regions and provinces.” See al-Itqan fi Ulum al-Quran by al-Suyuti, 2:322.
وَقَالَ عُثْمَانُ: إِنَّ فِي الْمُصْحَفِ لَحْنًا سَتُقِيمُهُ الْعَرَبُ بِأَلْسِنَتِهَا، فَقِيلَ لَهُ: أَلَا تُغَيِّرُهُ؟ فَقَالَ: دَعَوْهُ فَإِنَّهُ لَا يُحِلُّ حَرَامًا وَلَا يُحَرِّمُ حَلَالًا (١) . وَعَامَّةُ الصَّحَابَةِ وَأَهْلِ الْعِلْمِ عَلَى أَنَّهُ صَحِيحٌ، وَاخْتَلَفُوا فِيهِ، قِيلَ: هُوَ نَصْبٌ عَلَى الْمَدْحِ، وَقِيلَ: نَصُبٌ بِإِضْمَارِ فِعْلٍ تَقْدِيرُهُ: أَعْنِي الْمُقِيمِينَ الصَّلَاةَ وَهُمُ الْمُؤْتُونَ الزَّكَاةَ، وَقِيلَ: مَوْضِعُهُ خَفْضٌ. وَاخْتَلَفُوا فِي وَجْهِهِ، فَقَالَ بَعْضُهُمْ: مَعْنَاهُ لَكِنِ الرَّاسِخُونَ فِي الْعِلْمِ مِنْهُمْ وَمِنَ الْمُقِيمِينَ الصَّلَاةَ، وَقِيلَ: مَعْنَاهُ يُؤْمِنُونَ بِمَا أَنْزِلَ إِلَيْكَ وَإِلَى الْمُقِيمِينَ الصَّلَاةَ، ثُمَّ قَوْلُهُ: ﴿وَالْمُؤْتُونَ الزَّكَاةَ﴾ رُجُوعٌ إِلَى النَّسَقِ الْأَوَّلِ، ﴿وَالْمُؤْمِنُونَ بِاللَّهِ وَالْيَوْمِ الْآخِرِ أُولَئِكَ سَنُؤْتِيهِمْ أَجْرًا عَظِيمًا﴾ قَرَأَ حَمْزَةُ سَيُؤْتِيهِمْ بِالْيَاءِ وَالْبَاقُونَ بِالنُّونِ.
(١) قال ابن الأنباري في كتابه "الرد على من خالف مصحف عثمان": "الأحاديث المروية عن عثمان في ذلك لا تقوم بها حجة، لأنها منقطعة غير متصلة، وما يشهد عقل بأن عثمان، وهو إمام الأمة الذي هو إمام الناس في وقته وقدوتهم يجمعهم على المصحف الذي هو الإمام فيتبين فيه خللا، ويشاهد في خطه زللا فلا يصلحه! كلا والله ما يتوهم عليه هذا ذو إنصاف وتمييز، ولا يعتقد أنه أخر الخطأ في الكتاب ليصلحه من بعده، وسبيل الجائين من بعده: البناء على رسمه، والوقوف عند حكمه. ومن زعم أن عثمان أراد بقوله: "أرى فيه لحنا. . ": أرى في خطه لحنا إذا أقمناه بألسنتنا كان لحن الخط غير مفسد ولا محرف من جهة تحريف الألفاظ وإفساد الإعراب فقد أبطل ولم يصب، لأن الخط منبئ عن النطق، فمن لحن في كتبه، فهو لاحن في نطقه. ولم يكن عثمان ليؤخر فسادا في هجاء ألفاظ القرآن من جهة كتب ولا نطق، ومعلوم أنه كان مواصلا لدرس القرآن، متقنا لألفاظه، موافقا على ما رسم في المصاحف المنفذة إلى الأمصار والنواحي". انظر: الاتقان في علوم القرآن للسيوطي: ٢ / ٣٢٢.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies