Tafsir al-BaghawiAl-Baghawi

from straying and wandering off. The first view is the soundest, in light of what follows: “He said”—that is, Moses said to the two women—“What is the matter with you?” That is, why do you not water your livestock along with the people? They said, “We do not water”—our sheep—“until the shepherds have departed.” Abu Ja‘far, Abu ‘Amr, and Ibn ‘Amir read it as yasdura, with an intransitive sense: until the shepherds return from the water. The others read it as yusdiru: until they themselves lead their livestock away from the water. “Shepherds” is the plural of “shepherd,” just as “merchants” is the plural of “merchant.”

The meaning of the verse is: We do not water our livestock until the shepherds have departed, because we are two women, unable to draw water and unable to contend with the men. Once they have departed, we water our livestock with whatever water their livestock have left in the trough.

“And our father is a very old man”: he is unable to water his livestock, and so we have had to water the sheep ourselves. They differed over their father’s name. Mujahid, al-Dahhak, al-Suddi 62/b, and al-Hasan said that he was the Prophet Shu‘ayb, peace be upon him. Wahb ibn Munabbih and Sa‘id ibn Jubayr said: He was Jethro (1), the son of Shu‘ayb’s brother; Shu‘ayb had died before that, after becoming blind, and was buried between the Station and Zamzam. It was also said that he was a man from among those who believed in Shu‘ayb (2).

They said: When Moses heard what they said, he took pity on them and pulled away a rock from the mouth of another well near them—a rock which only a group of people could lift.

(1) Ibn Kathir said: “This is found in the books of Bani Israel (the Children of Israel).” (2) Al-Tabari, may Allah have mercy on him, said (20/62): “This is a matter whose knowledge can only be attained through a transmitted report, and there is no report concerning it whose authority must be accepted. Therefore, no statement is more correct than what Allah, exalted be His praise, has said...” After citing the preceding views, Ibn Kathir said (3/385-386): “Others said that Shuayb lived long before Musa, peace be upon him, because he said to his people: ‘The people of Lut are not far from you.’ The destruction of the people of Lut occurred in the time of al-Khalil, peace be upon him, as explicitly stated in the Quran. It is known that more than four hundred years elapsed between al-Khalil and Musa, as more than one scholar has mentioned. The claim that Shuayb lived for a long time was, Allah knows best, merely advanced to avoid this difficulty. Further evidence supporting the view that he was not Shuayb is that, had he been Shuayb, his name would likely have been explicitly mentioned here in the Quran. The reports that explicitly name him in the story of Musa have unsound chains of transmission.” For this reason, Sayyid Qutb wrote in Fi Zilal al-Quran (5/2687), note (1), Dar al-Shuruq edition: “I am now inclined to regard it as more likely that he was not Shuayb, but rather another elder from Madyan. What supports this preference is that this man was an elderly shaykh. Shuayb witnessed the destruction of his people who denied him, and only those who believed in him remained with him. Had he been the Prophet Shuayb among the remaining believers of his people, they would not have watered their flocks before the two daughters of their elderly prophet. This is neither the conduct of believing people nor the manner in which they would treat their prophet and his daughters, especially in the first generation. Moreover, the Quran does not mention anything about his teaching Musa, his son-in-law. Had he been the Prophet Shuayb, we would have heard the voice of prophethood in some aspect of his dealings with Musa, who lived with him for ten years.”
عَنْ أَنْ تَشِذَّ وَتَذْهَبَ. وَالْقَوْلُ الْأَوَّلُ أَصْوَبُهَا، لِمَا بَعْدَهُ، وَهُوَ قَوْلُهُ: ﴿قَالَ﴾ يَعْنِي: مُوسَى لِلْمَرْأَتَيْنِ، ﴿مَا خَطْبُكُمَا﴾ مَا شَأْنُكُمَا لَا تَسْقِيَانِ مَوَاشِيَكُمَا مَعَ النَّاسِ؟ ﴿قَالَتَا لَا نَسْقِي﴾ أَغْنَامَنَا، ﴿حَتَّى يُصْدِرَ الرِّعَاءُ﴾ قَرَأَ أَبُو جَعْفَرٍ، وَأَبُو عَمْرٍو، وَابْنُ عَامِرٍ: "يَصْدُرَ" بِفَتْحِ الْيَاءِ وَضَمِّ الدَّالِ عَلَى اللُّزُومِ، أَيْ: حَتَّى يَرْجِعَ الرِّعَاءُ عَنِ الْمَاءِ، وَقَرَأَ الْآخَرُونَ: بِضَمِّ الْيَاءِ وَكَسْرِ الدَّالِ، أَيْ: حَتَّى يَصْرِفُوا هُمْ مَوَاشِيَهُمْ عَنِ الْمَاءِ، وَ"الرِّعَاءُ" جَمْعُ رَاعٍ، مِثَلَ: تَاجِرٍ وَتُجَّارٍ. وَمَعْنَى الْآيَةِ: لَا نَسْقِي مَوَاشِيَنَا حَتَّى يُصْدِرَ الرِّعَاءُ، لِأَنَّا امْرَأَتَانِ لَا نُطِيقُ أَنْ نَسْقِيَ، وَلَا نَسْتَطِيعُ أَنْ نُزَاحِمَ الرِّجَالَ، فَإِذَا صَدَرُوا سَقَيْنَا مَوَاشِيَنَا مَا أَفْضَلَتْ مَوَاشِيهُمْ فِي الْحَوْضِ. ﴿وَأَبُونَا شَيْخٌ كَبِيرٌ﴾ لَا يَقْدِرُ أَنْ يَسْقِيَ مَوَاشِيَهُ، فَلِذَلِكَ احْتَجْنَا نَحْنُ إِلَى سَقْيِ الْغَنَمِ. وَاخْتَلَفُوا فِي اسْمِ أَبِيهِمَا، فَقَالَ مُجَاهِدٌ، والضحاك، والسدي ٦٢/ب وَالْحَسَنُ: هُوَ شُعَيْبٌ النَّبِيُّ ﵇. وَقَالَ وَهْبُ بْنُ مُنَبِّهٍ، وَسَعِيدُ بْنُ جُبَيْرٍ: هُوَ يَثْرُونُ (١) بْنُ أَخِي شُعَيْبٍ، وَكَانَ شُعَيْبٌ قَدْ مَاتَ قَبْلَ ذَلِكَ بَعْدَمَا كُفَّ بَصَرُهُ، فَدُفِنَ بَيْنَ الْمَقَامِ وَزَمْزَمَ. وَقِيلَ: رَجُلٌ مِمَّنْ آمَنَ بِشُعَيْبٍ (٢) قَالُوا: فَلَمَّا سَمِعَ مُوسَى قَوْلَهَمَا رَحِمَهُمَا فَاقْتَلَعَ صَخْرَةً مِنْ رَأْسِ بِئْرٍ أُخْرَى كَانَتْ بِقُرْبِهِمَا لَا يُطِيقُ رَفْعَهَا إِلَّا جَمَاعَةٌ مِنَ النَّاسِ.
(١) قال ابن كثير: إن هذا موجود في كتب بني إسرائيل. (٢) قال الطبري ﵀ (٢٠ / ٦٢) : "وهذا مما لا يدرك علمه إلا بخير، ولا خبر بذلك تجب حجته، فلا قول في ذلك أولى بالصواب مما قاله الله جل ثناؤه..". وبعد أن ذكر ابن كثير الآراء السالفة قال: (٣ / ٣٨٥-٣٨٦) : "وقال آخرون: كان شعيب قبل زمان موسى ﵇ بمدة طويلة لأنه قال لقومه: (وما قوم لوط منكم ببعيد) وقد كان هلاك قوم لوط في زمن الخليل ﵇ بنص القرآن، وقد علم أنه كان بين الخليل وموسى ﵉ مدة طويلة تزيد على أربعمائة سنة، كما ذكره غير واحد. وما قيل إن شعيبا عاش مدة طويلة إنما هو -والله أعلم- احتراز من هذا الإشكال، ثم من المقوي لكونه ليس بشعيب: أنه لو كان إياه لأوشك أن ينص على اسمه في القرآن هاهنا، وما جاء في بعض الأحاديث من التصريح بذكره في قصة موسى لم يصح إسناده". ولذلك قال الأستاذ سيد قطب في "الظلال" (٥ / ٢٦٨٧) تعليق (١) -طبعة دار الشروق- " ... وأنا الآن أميل إلى ترجيح أنه ليس هو -شعيب- وإنما هو شيخ آخر من مدين. والذي يحمل على هذا الترجيح: أن هذا الرجل شيخ كبير. وشعيب شهد مهلك قومه، المكذبين له، ولم يبق معه إلا المؤمنون به، فلو كان هو شعيب -النبي- بين بقية قومه المؤمنين، ما سقوا قبل بنتي نبيهم الشيخ الكبير. فليس هذا سلوك قوم مؤمنين، ولا معاملتهم لنبيهم وبناته من أول جيل!. يضاف إلى هذا: أن القرآن لم يذكر شيئا عن تعليمه لموسى صهره، ولو كان شعيبا النبي سمعنا صوت النبوة في شيء من هذا مع موسى وقد عاش معه عشر سنوات".

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies