the month of Ramadan, with six nights remaining thereafter. (1)
His saying, Most High: “as guidance for humankind”—that is, away from misguidance. The word hudan (guidance) is in the accusative by way of detachment, since “the Quran” is definite whereas “guidance” is indefinite. “And clear proofs of guidance”: that is, clear indications concerning what is lawful and unlawful, the prescribed penalties, and legal rulings. “And the Criterion”: that is, what distinguishes truth from falsehood.
His saying, Most High: “So whoever among you witnesses the month must fast it”—that is, whoever is resident rather than travelling when the month arrives. The scholars differed concerning one who is resident when the month arrives and then travels. It is related from Ali, may Allah be pleased with him, that he said: “He is not permitted to break the fast.” This was also the view of Ubaydah al-Salmani, based on His saying, Most High: “So whoever among you witnesses the month must fast it,” meaning the entire month.
Most of the Companions and jurists held that if one begins a journey during Ramadan, he may break the fast. The meaning of the verse, in their view, is: Whoever among you witnesses the entire month must fast the entire month; and whoever does not witness the entire month must fast the part of it which he witnesses. The evidence for this is what Abu al-Hasan al-Sarakhsi informed us: Zahir ibn Ahmad informed us; Abu Ishaq al-Hashimi informed us; Abu Musab informed us, from Malik, from Ibn Shihab, from Ubayd Allah ibn Utbah ibn Masud, from Ibn Abbas, that the Messenger of Allah, blessings and peace be upon him, set out for Mecca in Ramadan in the year of the Conquest. He fasted until he reached al-Kadid, then broke his fast, and the people broke their fast with him. Thus, they would follow the latest of the Messenger of Allah’s instructions, blessings and peace be upon him. (2)
His saying, Most High: “And whoever is sick or on a journey, then let him fast the same number of other days.” He permitted breaking the fast on account of the excuse of illness or travel. He repeated this statement so that it would be known that this ruling remains established in the abrogating text just as it was established in the abrogated text.
They differed regarding the illness that permits breaking the fast. The literalists held that anything to which the term illness applies permits one to break the fast. This was the view of Ibn Sirin. Tarif ibn Tamam al-Utaridi said: “I visited Muhammad ibn Sirin during Ramadan while he was eating. He said, ‘This finger of mine has become sore.’”
Al-Hasan and Ibrahim al-Nakhaʿi said: It is the illness in which one is permitted to pray seated. 26/A The majority held that it is an illness in which fasting is feared to cause an intolerable worsening of the condition. In sum, if fasting exhausts him, he may break the fast; but if it does not exhaust him, then he is like one who is healthy.
As for travel, breaking the fast while travelling is permitted, and fasting is permissible according to the generality of the scholars—except what is related from Ibn Abbas, Abu Hurayrah, Urwah ibn al-Zubayr, and Ali ibn al-Husayn: they said that fasting while travelling is not permissible, and whoever fasts must make it up. They cited the Prophet’s saying, blessings and peace be upon him: “Fasting while travelling is not an act of righteousness.” (3) According to the others, that applies in the case of one whom