Tafsir al-BaghawiAl-Baghawi

people of Medina. Some poor Muslims therefore wished to marry them so that the women might support them financially. They sought the Messenger of Allah’s permission, and this verse was revealed: “And that is forbidden to the believers” (1)—that is, believers were forbidden to marry those prostitutes because they were polytheist women. This was the view of Mujahid, Ata’ ibn Abi Rabah, Qatadah, al-Zuhri, al-Sha‘bi, and al-‘Awfi’s narration from Ibn Abbas.

Ikrimah said: It was revealed concerning women in Mecca and Medina, among whom were nine who had banners like those of a farrier, by which they were recognized. Among them was Umm Mahzul, the slave-girl of al-Sa’ib ibn Abi al-Sa’ib al-Makhzumi. In the pre-Islamic era, a man would marry a fornicatress and make her a source of livelihood. Some Muslims wished to marry them on that same basis. One Muslim sought the Messenger of Allah’s permission to marry Umm Mahzul, and she stipulated that she would support him financially. Thereupon Allah revealed this verse (2).

Amr ibn Shu‘ayb narrated from his father, from his grandfather, that he said: There was a man called Marthad ibn Abi Marthad al-Ghanawi, who would transport captives from Mecca and bring them to Medina. In Mecca there was a prostitute called Anaq, who had been his companion in the pre-Islamic era. When he came to Mecca, Anaq invited him to herself, but Marthad said, “Allah has forbidden fornication.” She said, “Then marry me.” He replied, “Not until I ask the Messenger of Allah.” He said: So I came to the Prophet and asked, “O Messenger of Allah, should I marry Anaq?” The Messenger of Allah withheld his response and said nothing. Then the following was revealed: “None marries a fornicatress except a fornicator or a polytheist.” He then called me, recited it to me, and said, “Do not marry her” (3). According to the view of these scholars, the prohibition applied specifically to those individuals and not to all other people.

Others said that the intended meaning of marriage here is sexual intercourse; thus, the meaning is that a fornicator commits fornication only with a fornicatress or a polytheist woman, and a fornicatress commits fornication only with a fornicator or a polytheist man. This was the view of Sa‘id ibn Jubayr and al-Dahhak ibn Muzahim, as well as al-Walibi’s narration from Ibn Abbas. Yazid ibn Harun said: If he has intercourse with her while considering it lawful, then he is a polytheist; but if he has intercourse with her while recognizing it as unlawful, then he is a fornicator. Ibn Mas‘ud forbade marrying a fornicatress and would say, “When a fornicator marries a fornicatress, they remain fornicators forever.” Al-Hasan said: A fornicator who has been flogged may marry only a fornicatress who has been flogged, and a fornicatress who has been flogged may be married only by a fornicator who has been flogged. Sa‘id ibn al-Musayyib and a group of scholars said that the ruling of the verse has been abrogated: marriage to a fornicatress had been forbidden by this verse, but it was abrogated by Allah Most High’s saying, “Marry off those among you who are unmarried.” Thus, the fornicatress is included among the unmarried Muslims (4).

(1) An excerpt from a hadith attributed by al-Suyuti in al-Durr al-Manthur, 6:127, to Ibn Abi Hatim. (2) Narrated by Imam Ahmad, 2:159. See also al-Wahidi, Asbab al-Nuzul, pp. 364–366; and Tafsir al-Tabari, 18:71. (3) Narrated by Abu Dawud in the Book of Marriage, chapter: Allah's statement, “The fornicator does not marry except a female fornicator,” 3:6; al-Tirmidhi in the commentary on Surat al-Nur, 9:21–23, who said: “This is a hasan gharib hadith; we know it only through this route”; and al-Nasa'i in the Book of Marriage, chapter: “Marrying a Female Fornicator,” 6:66–67, on the authority of Abd Allah ibn Amr ibn al-As. It was authenticated by al-Hakim, 2:166, and approved by al-Dhahabi. See also al-Tabari, 18:71. (4) Al-Tabari mentions these views, 18:74–75. He then stated, preferring one view: “In my view, the most correct opinion is that nikah (sexual intercourse) in this passage means intercourse, and that the verse was revealed concerning polytheist prostitutes who displayed flags. This is because the evidence establishes that a Muslim female fornicator is forbidden to every polytheist man, and that a Muslim male fornicator is forbidden every polytheist woman who worships idols. Since this is so, it is clear that the verse does not mean that a believing fornicator may not enter into a marriage contract with a chaste Muslim woman, and may marry only a female fornicator or a polytheist woman. Rather, the meaning of the verse is that the fornicator commits zina (unlawful sexual intercourse) only with a female fornicator who does not regard zina as lawful, or with a polytheist woman who regards it as lawful.”
أَهْلِ الْمَدِينَةِ، فَرَغَبَ أُنَاسٌ مِنْ فُقَرَاءِ الْمُسْلِمِينَ فِي نِكَاحِهِنَّ لِيُنْفِقْنَ عَلَيْهِمْ، فَاسْتَأْذَنُوا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ ﷺ فَنَزَلَتْ هَذِهِ الْآيَةُ (١) ﴿وَحُرِّمَ ذَلِكَ عَلَى الْمُؤْمِنِينَ﴾ أَنْ يَتَزَوَّجُوا تِلْكَ الْبَغَايَا لِأَنَّهُنَّ كُنَّ مُشْرِكَاتٍ، وَهَذَا قَوْلُ مُجَاهِدٍ وَعَطَاءِ بْنِ أَبِي رَبَاحٍ وَقَتَادَةَ وَالزُّهْرِيِّ وَالشَّعْبِيِّ، وَرِوَايَةُ الْعَوْفِيِّ عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ. وَقَالَ عِكْرِمَةُ: نَزَلَتْ فِي نِسَاءٍ بِمَكَّةَ وَالْمَدِينَةِ، مِنْهُنَّ تِسْعٌ لَهُنَّ رَايَاتٌ كَرَايَاتِ الْبِيطَارِ يُعْرَفْنَ بِهَا، مِنْهُنَّ أُمُّ مَهْزُولٍ جَارِيَةُ السَّائِبِ بْنِ أَبِي السَّائِبِ الْمَخْزُومِيِّ، وَكَانَ الرَّجُلُ يَنْكِحُ الزَّانِيَةَ فِي الْجَاهِلِيَّةِ يَتَّخِذُهَا مَأْكَلَةً، فَأَرَادَ نَاسٌ مِنَ الْمُسْلِمِينَ نِكَاحَهُنَّ عَلَى تِلْكَ الْجِهَةِ، فَاسْتَأْذَنَ رَجُلٌ مِنَ الْمُسْلِمِينَ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ ﷺ فِي نِكَاحِ أُمِّ مَهْزُولٍ وَاشْتَرَطَتْ لَهُ أَنْ تُنْفِقَ عَلَيْهِ، فَأَنْزَلَ اللَّهُ هَذِهِ الْآيَةَ (٢) . وَرَوَى عَمْرُو بْنُ شُعَيْبٍ عَنْ أَبِيهِ عَنْ جَدِّهِ قَالَ: كَانَ رَجُلٌ يُقَالُ لَهُ مَرْثَدُ بْنُ أَبِي مَرْثَدٍ الْغَنَوِيُّ كَانَ يَحْمِلُ الْأَسَارَى مِنْ مَكَّةَ حَتَّى يَأْتِيَ بِهِمُ الْمَدِينَةَ، وَكَانَتْ بِمَكَّةَ بَغِيٌّ يُقَالُ لَهَا عَنَاقُ، وَكَانَتْ صَدِيقَةً لَهُ فِي الْجَاهِلِيَّةِ، فَلَمَّا أَتَى مَكَّةَ دَعَتْهُ عَنَاقُ إِلَى نَفْسِهَا، فَقَالَ مَرْثَدٌ: إِنَّ اللَّهَ حَرَّمَ الزِّنَا، قَالَتْ: فَانْكِحْنِي، فَقَالَ: حَتَّى أَسْأَلَ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ ﷺ، قَالَ: فَأَتَيْتُ النَّبِيَّ ﷺ فَقُلْتُ: يَا رَسُولَ الله أنكح عناقا؟ فَأَمْسَكَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ ﷺ فَلَمْ يَرُدَّ شَيْئًا، فَنَزَلَتْ: ﴿وَالزَّانِيَةُ لَا يَنْكِحُهَا إِلَّا زَانٍ أَوْ مُشْرِكٌ﴾ فَدَعَانِي فَقَرَأَهَا عَلَيَّ وَقَالَ لِي: لَا تَنْكِحْهَا (٣) . فَعَلَى قَوْلِ هَؤُلَاءِ كَانَ التَّحْرِيمُ خَاصًّا فِي حَقِّ أُولَئِكَ دُونَ سَائِرِ النَّاسِ. وَقَالَ قَوْمٌ: الْمُرَادُ مِنَ النِّكَاحِ هُوَ الْجِمَاعُ، وَمَعْنَاهُ: الزَّانِي لَا يَزْنِي إِلَّا بِزَانِيَةٍ أَوْ مُشْرِكَةٍ، وَالزَّانِيَةُ لَا تَزْنِي إِلَّا بِزَانٍ أَوْ مُشْرِكٍ، وَهُوَ قَوْلُ سَعِيدِ بْنِ جُبَيْرٍ وَالضَّحَّاكِ بْنِ مُزَاحِمٍ. وَرِوَايَةُ الْوَالِبِيِّ عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ، قَالَ يَزِيدُ بْنُ هَارُونَ: إِنْ جَامَعَهَا وَهُوَ مُسْتَحِلٌّ فَهُوَ مُشْرِكٌ، وَإِنْ جَامَعَهَا وَهُوَ مُحَرِّمٌ فَهُوَ زَانٍ، وَكَانَ ابْنُ مَسْعُودٍ يُحَرِّمُ نِكَاحَ الزَّانِيَةِ وَيَقُولُ: إِذَا تَزَوَّجَ الزَّانِي بِالزَّانِيَةِ فَهُمَا زَانِيَانِ أَبَدًا. وَقَالَ الْحَسَنُ: الزَّانِي الْمَجْلُودُ لَا يَنْكِحُ إِلَّا زَانِيَةً مَجْلُودَةً وَالزَّانِيَةُ الْمَجْلُودَةُ لَا يَنْكِحُهَا إِلَّا زَانٍ مَجْلُودٌ. قَالَ سَعِيدُ بْنُ الْمُسَيَّبِ وَجَمَاعَةٌ: إِنَّ حُكْمَ الْآيَةِ مَنْسُوخٌ، فَكَانَ نِكَاحُ الزَّانِيَةِ حَرَامًا بِهَذِهِ الْآيَةِ فَنَسَخَهَا قَوْلُهُ تَعَالَى: "وَأَنْكِحُوا الْأَيَامَى مِنْكُمْ" فَدَخَلَتِ الزَّانِيَةُ فِي أَيَامَى الْمُسْلِمِينَ (٤) .
(١) قطعة من حديث عزاه السيوطي في الدر: (٦ / ١٢٧) لابن أبي حاتم. (٢) أخرجه الإمام أحمد: ٢ / ١٥٩ وانظر: أسباب النزول للواحدي ص ٣٦٤-٣٦٦، تفسير الطبري: ١٨ / ٧١. (٣) أخرجه أبو داود في النكاح، باب: قوله تعالى "الزاني لا ينكح إلا زانية" ٣ / ٦، والترمذي في تفسير سورة النور: ٩ / ٢١-٢٣ وقال: "هذا حديث حسن غريب لا نعرفه إلا من هذا الوجه"، والنسائي في النكاح، باب: تزويج الزانية ٦ / ٦٦-٦٧ من حديث عبد الله بن عمرو بن العاص، وصححه الحاكم ٢ / ١٦٦ وأقره الذهبي، والطبري: ١٨ / ٧١. (٤) ذكر هذه الأقوال الطبري: ١٨ / ٧٤-٧٥. ثم قال مرجحا: وأولى الأقوال في ذلك عندي بالصواب قول من قال: عنى بالنكاح في هذه الموضع: الوطء، وأن الآية نزلت في البغايا المشركات ذوات الرايات، وذلك لقيام الحجة على أن الزانية من المسلمات حرام على كل مشرك، وأن الزاني من المسلمين حرام عليه كل مشركة من عبدة الأوثان. فمعلوم إذ كان ذلك كذلك، أنه لم يعن بالآية أن الزاني من المؤمنين لا يعقد عقد نكاح على عفيفة من المسلمات، ولا ينكح إلا بزانية أو مشركة. وإذ كان ذلك كذلك، فبين أن معنى الآية: الزاني لا يزني إلا بزانية لا تستحل الزنا، أو بمشركة تستحله.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies