Nuzhat al-Nazar fi Tawdih Nukhbat al-Fikar - Tahqiq al-QasimIbn Hajar Al-Asqalani

through Nāfiʿ, from Ibn ʿUmar, with the wording (1): “faqdurū (2) thalāthīn” — “then reckon it as thirty” (3).

And in this mutābaʿa — whether it be complete (4) or (5) partial — corroboration is not restricted to identical wording; agreement in meaning alone is sufficient, provided that the report is still transmitted from that very Companion.

[Shawāhid]
If a text is found that is transmitted through another Companion and resembles it in both wording and meaning, or in meaning alone, then it is called a shāhid.

Its example (6) with regard to the ḥadith we mentioned earlier (7) is what al-Nasaʾi (8) recorded: from Muḥammad ibn Ḥunayn, from Ibn ʿAbbās, from the Prophet ﷺ, in which he cited wording identical to that of ʿAbd Allāh ibn Dīnār from Ibn ʿUmar. This, then, is a corroboration by wording.

As for a corroboration by meaning, it is what al-Bukhārī (9) narrated through Muḥammad ibn Ziyād, from Abū Hurayrah, in the wording: “fa-in ghumma (10) ʿalaykum fa-akmilū ʿiddata Shaʿbān thalāthīn” — “If the sky is overcast for you, then complete the count of Shaʿbān as thirty.”

(1) The word bilafz (“in these exact words”) is not found in MS B. (2) MS B adds the word lahu (“for him”). (3) Sahih Muslim, no. 1080. (4) MS J reads akanat (“was it”). (5) MSS B and Z read aw (“or”). (6) MS J reads mithalahu (“its example”). (7) MS T reads qaddamna (“we have already stated”). (8) Al-Mujtaba, no. 2125. (9) In his Sahih, no. 1909. (10) MSS B, J, D, H, W, Z, Ha, T, Y, and M read ghammi; the wording adopted in the present text accords with al-Bukhari’s narration transmitted through al-Mustamli, where the form ghummi does not appear at this point. See Fath al-Bari 4/124 and Irshad al-Sari 3/357. The form ghummi from the same chain is, however, found in Muslim, no. 1081.
عَنْ نَافِعٍ، عَنِ ابْنِ عُمَرَ بِلَفْظِ (١): «فَاقْدُرُوا (٢) ثَلَاثِينَ» (٣). وَلَا اقْتِصَارَ فِي هَذِهِ المُتَابَعَةِ - سَوَاءٌ كَانَتْ (٤) تَامَّةً أَمْ (٥) قَاصِرَةً - عَلَى اللَّفْظِ؛ بَلْ لَوْ جَاءَتْ بِالمَعْنَى كَفَى، لَكِنَّهَا مُخْتَصَّةٌ بِكَوْنِهَا مِنْ رِوَايَةِ ذَلِكَ الصَّحَابِيِّ. [الشواهد] (وَإِنْ وُجِدَ مَتْنٌ) يُرْوَى مِنْ حَدِيثِ صَحَابِيٍّ آخَرَ (يُشْبِهُهُ) فِي اللَّفْظِ وَالمَعْنَى، أَوْ فِي المَعْنَى فَقَطْ؛ (فَهُوَ الشَّاهِدُ). وَمِثَالُهُ (٦) فِي الحَدِيثِ الَّذِي قَدَّمْنَاهُ (٧): مَا رَوَاهُ النَّسَائِيُّ (٨): مِنْ رِوَايَةِ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ حُنَيْنٍ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ، عَنِ النَّبِيِّ ﷺ، فَذَكَرَ مِثْلَ حَدِيثِ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ دِينَارٍ، عَنِ ابْنِ عُمَرَ سَوَاءً. فَهَذَا بِاللَّفْظِ. وَأَمَّا بِالمَعْنَى: فَهُوَ مَا رَوَاهُ البُخَارِيُّ (٩) مِنْ رِوَايَةِ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ زِيَادٍ، عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ بِلَفْظِ: «فَإِنْ غُمَّ (١٠) عَلَيْكُمْ فَأَكْمِلُوا عِدَّةَ شَعْبَانَ ثَلَاثِينَ».
(١) «بِلَفْظِ» ليست في ب. (٢) في ب زيادة: «له». (٣) صحيح مسلم (١٠٨٠). (٤) في ج: «أكانت». (٥) في ب، ز: «أوْ». (٦) في ج: «مثاله». (٧) في ط: «قدَّمنا». (٨) في المجتبى (٢١٢٥). (٩) في صحيحه (١٩٠٩). (١٠) في ب، ج، د، هـ، و، ز، ح، ط، ي، م: «غمِّي»، والمثبتُ هو المطابق لرواية البخاريِّ المشار إليها من طريق المستملي، ولم يُذكر عنه في هذا الموضع: «غُمِّي». انظر: فتح الباري (٤/ ١٢٤)، وإرشاد الساري (٣/ ٣٥٧)، وأمَّا لفظة «غُمِّي» من الطَّريق المشار إليه فوردت عند مسلم (١٠٨١).

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies