Nuzhat al-Nazar fi Tawdih Nukhbat al-Fikar - Tahqiq al-QasimIbn Hajar Al-Asqalani

[al-muttafiq wa’l-muftariq] (identical yet distinct)

Next, with respect to the transmitters: when their given names and the names of their fathers—and those further up the line—are identical while the persons themselves are different, whether the coincidence involves two of them or (1) more, and likewise when two or more people share the same kunyah (2) or the same nisbah (lineage) (3), this constitutes the category that is called (4) al-muttafiq (5) wa’l-muftariq.

The benefit of knowing this category is to guard against (6) assuming that two separate individuals are one and the same.

Al-Khatib (8) authored (7) a comprehensive (9) book on the subject, which I have abridged and considerably expanded (10).

This is the converse of the previously discussed category called al-muhmal, for in that case the concern is that one narrator might be thought to be two, whereas here the concern is that two narrators might be taken for one.

(1) In manuscripts B, C, and W the reading is “aw” (or). (2) Manuscript A has “al-tasmiyah” (the naming). (3) Manuscript K reads “fi al-nisbah” (regarding lineage); another copy, in its margin, has “fi al-kunyah wa-l-nisbah” (regarding the kunyah and the lineage). (4) The word lahu (for him) is missing from manuscript D. (5) Manuscript B has al-mutafaqu with a fatḥah on the fāʾ; the adopted reading follows C, D, W, and H. Al-Qari states in his Sharḥ Sharḥ al-Nukhbah (p. 697) that it should be read with a kasrah. (6) Manuscript A reads “wa-fāʾidatu maʿrifati ḥusnihi” (and the benefit of knowing its soundness), which is a corrupt reading. (7) The word fīhi (in it) is absent from manuscript M. (8) Manuscript D has the phrase “al-Khatib fīhi,” with the two words transposed. (9) He entitled the work al-Mutafaq wa-l-Muftariq; it is in print. (10) Al-Sakhawi says in Fatḥ al-Mughīth (4:266): “Our shaykh began to abridge it and, as far as I have seen, wrote only a little of it, even though in his Sharḥ al-Nukhbah he claims to have abridged it and added many new points. I have started completing it, supplying matters he overlooked.” See also al-Jawāhir wa-l-Durar (2:680).
[المتَّفِق والمفترق] (ثُمَّ الرُّوَاةُ؛ إِنِ اتَّفَقَتْ أَسْمَاؤُهُمْ وَأَسْمَاءُ آبَائِهِمْ فَصَاعِداً، وَاخْتَلَفَتْ أَشْخَاصُهُمْ) سَوَاءٌ اتَّفَقَ فِي ذَلِكَ اثْنَانِ مِنْهُمْ أَمْ (١) أَكْثَرُ، وَكَذَلِكَ إِذَا اتَّفَقَ اثْنَانِ فَصَاعِداً فِي الكُنْيَةِ (٢) وَالنِّسْبَةِ (٣)؛ (فَهُوَ) النَّوْعُ الَّذِي يُقَالُ لَهُ (٤): (المُتَّفِقُ (٥) وَالمُفْتَرِقُ). وَفَائِدَةُ مَعْرِفَتِهِ: خَشْيَةُ (٦) أَنْ يُظَنَّ الشَّخْصَانِ شَخْصاً وَاحِداً. وَقَدْ صَنَّفَ فِيهِ (٧) الخَطِيبُ (٨) كِتَاباً حَافِلاً (٩)، وَقَدْ لَخَّصْتُهُ وَزِدْتُ عَلَيْهِ شَيْئاً كَثِيراً (١٠). وَهَذَا عَكْسُ مَا تَقَدَّمَ مِنَ النَّوْعِ المُسَمَّى بِالمُهْمَلِ؛ لِأَنَّهُ يُخْشَى مِنْهُ أَنْ يُظَنَّ الوَاحِدُ اثْنَيْنِ، وَهَذَا يُخْشَى مِنْهُ أَنْ يُظَنَّ الِاثْنَانِ وَاحِداً.
(١) في ب، ج، و: «أو». (٢) في أ: «التسمية». (٣) في ك: «في النسبة»، وفي نسخة على حاشيتها: «في الكنية والنسبة». (٤) «لَهُ» سقطت من د. (٥) في ب: «المتفَقُ» بفتح الفاء، والمثبت من ج، د، و، ح. قال القارِي ﵀ في شرح شرح النُّخبة (ص ٦٩٧): «بالكسر». (٦) في أ: «وفائدة معرفة حسنه»، وهو تحريف. (٧) «فيه» ليست في م. (٨) في د: «الخطيب فيه» بتقديم وتأخير. (٩) سماه: «المتفق والمفترق»، وهو مطبوع. (١٠) قال السَّخاوي ﵀ في فتح المغيث (٤/ ٢٦٦): «شرع شيخُنا في تلخيصه فكتب منه - حسبما وقفت عليه - يسيراً، مع قوله في شرح النُّخبة: إنه لخَّصه وزاد عليه أشياء كثيرة، وقد شَرَعْتُ في تكملته مع استدراك أشياء فاتته». وانظر: الجواهر والدُّرر (٢/ ٦٨٠).

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies