and that version is preferred (11), tipping the balance toward one of the two possibilities mentioned. This indicates that the ḥadith is preserved; accordingly, it ascends from the level of withholding judgment to the level of acceptance, and Allah knows best (1).
Even after this elevation to the rank of acceptance (2)(3), it still falls short of the grade of ḥasan li-dhātihi (4)(5), and some scholars may, therefore, refrain from freely applying the term ḥasan to it.
With this, the discussion that concerns the matn in terms of acceptance and rejection is concluded (6).
Then comes the isnād, which is “the path that leads to the text” (7).
The matn is “the final wording to which the chain of transmission reaches”; and it is (8) either that the chain terminates with the Prophet ﷺ—its phrasing, whether explicitly (9) or implicitly, indicating that what is conveyed through that isnād is from his statement ﷺ, or from his action, or from his tacit approval (10).