Nuzhat al-Nazar fi Tawdih Nukhbat al-Fikar - Tahqiq al-Qasim - Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalani - (160)

Nuzhat al-Nazar fi Tawdih Nukhbat al-Fikar - Tahqiq al-QasimIbn Hajar Al-Asqalani

Second: This occurs when a narrator possesses only a portion of the text; he holds that portion (1) through a different isnād. A later transmitter then relates the entire report from him but cites the first isnād. A similar situation is when the narrator hears from his shaykh only part of the ḥadith (2), then hears the remainder (3) from the same shaykh through an intermediary (4); someone later transmits the full ḥadith from him (5) while omitting the intermediary (6).

Third: A narrator may have two different texts (7), each with its own isnād. A subsequent transmitter reports both texts from him while mentioning only one (8) of the two isnāds, or he relates one of the two reports with its particular chain but inserts into it material from the other text that was not present in (9) the first.

Fourth: A narrator may begin citing an isnād (10), when something interrupts him, prompting him to insert words of his own (11). Some of the listeners (12) assume that these words are the matn of that isnād and transmit it from him accordingly.

These (13) are the divisions of interpolated isnād (14).

(1) The word “ʿindahu” (with him) is missing in K. (2) The passage from “fa-innahu ʿindahu” (for it is with him) up to this point is absent in T. (3) Z reads “fa-samiʿahu” (and he heard it). (4) A adds “raw” (narrator). (5) The word “rawin” (a narrator) is omitted in Y and K. (6) W reads “tamaman” (completely). (7) A and Y have “shayʾan” (two things), while the copy in the margin of Y reads “matnan” (two texts). (8) D has “akhadh” (took), a scribal error. (9) A reads “min” (from). (10) L adds “al-rawi” (the narrator). (11) H and M read “fa-yaqula” (so he says) with the verb in the subjunctive; the adopted text follows K. (12) The word “baʿdu” (some) is not found in T. (13) K reads “wa-hadhihi” (and this). (14) In the margin of A, D, and W, in the author’s own hand, appears: “thumma balagha kadhalik” (then it likewise reached).

الثَّانِي: أَنْ يَكُونَ المَتْنُ عِنْدَ رَاوٍ إِلَّا طَرَفاً مِنْهُ؛ فَإِنَّهُ عِنْدَهُ (١) بِإِسْنَادٍ آخَرَ، فَيَرْوِيهِ رَاوٍ عَنْهُ تَامّاً بِالإِسْنَادِ الأَوَّلِ، وَمِنْهُ أَنْ يَسْمَعَ الحَدِيثَ مِنْ شَيْخِهِ إِلَّا طَرَفاً مِنْهُ (٢) فَيَسْمَعَهُ (٣) عَنْ شَيْخِهِ بِوَاسِطَةٍ (٤)، فَيَرْوِيهِ رَاوٍ (٥) عَنْهُ تَامّاً (٦) بِحَذْفِ الوَاسِطَةِ. الثَّالِثُ: أَنْ يَكُونَ عِنْدَ الرَّاوِي مَتْنَانِ (٧) مُخْتَلِفَانِ بِإِسْنَادَيْنِ مُخْتَلِفَيْنِ، فَيَرْوِيهِمَا رَاوٍ عَنْهُ مُقْتَصِراً عَلَى أَحَدِ (٨) الإِسْنَادَيْنِ، أَوْ يَرْوِيَ أَحَدَ الحَدِيثَيْنِ بِإِسْنَادِهِ الخَاصِّ بِهِ، لَكِنْ يَزِيدُ فِيهِ مِنَ المَتْنِ الآخَرِ مَا لَيْسَ فِي (٩) الأَوَّلِ. الرَّابِعُ: أَنْ يَسُوقَ (١٠) الإِسْنَادَ فَيَعْرِضُ لَهُ عَارِضٌ، فَيَقُولُ (١١) كَلَاماً مِنْ قِبَلِ نَفْسِهِ، فَيَظُنُّ بَعْضُ (١٢) مَنْ سَمِعَهُ أَنَّ ذَلِكَ الكَلَامَ هُوَ مَتْنُ ذَلِكَ الإِسْنَادِ، فَيَرْوِيَهُ عَنْهُ كَذَلِكَ. هَذِهِ (١٣) أَقْسَامُ مُدْرَجِ الإِسْنَادِ (١٤).

(١) «عِنْدَهُ» سقطت من ك. (٢) من قوله: «فَإِنَّهُ عِنْدَهُ» إلى هنا سقط من ط. (٣) في ز: «فسمعه». (٤) في أ زيادة: «راو». (٥) «رَاوٍ» سقطت من ي، ك. (٦) في و: «تماما». (٧) في أ، ي: «شيئان»، وفي نسخة على حاشية ي: «متنان». (٨) في د: «أخذ» وهو تصحيف. (٩) في أ: «من». (١٠) في ل زيادة: «الرّاوي». (١١) في ح، م: «فيقولَ» بالنَّصب، والمثبت من ك. (١٢) «بَعْضُ» ليست في ط. (١٣) في ك: «وهذه». (١٤) في حاشية أ، د، و - بخطِّ المُصنِّف -: «ثم بلغ كذلك».