Along with the gracious sentence you placed in your letter, where you said (p. 32):

“It is obligatory for every researcher who seeks fairness and justice to stand between the opposing proofs as a judge stands between two litigants, ruling by knowledge and never preferring one side over the other without evidence,”

I do not think you actually did what you made obligatory. Had you done so, you would—God willing—never have cited that report, for its weakness is obvious. Or, if the opposite is true and you considered it sound—something far removed from what “every researcher” would hold—why did you conceal the proof of its authenticity? Is that the posture of a judge between two disputants?
“O you who believe, why do you say what you do not do? It is most hateful in the sight of Allah that you say what you do not do” (Al-Saff 61:2-3).

The second ḥadith: another weak report that they use as evidence and that Shaykh al-Tuwajiri and his imitators keep repeating. It states: “When Ibn Sīrīn asked ʿUbaydah al-Salmani about the verse of idnāʾ (drawing close), ʿUbaydah wrapped himself in a cloak, covered his entire head down to the eyebrows, veiled his face, and exposed only his left eye.” Al-Suyūṭi recorded it in al-Durr (5/221), and al-Tuwajiri quoted it (pp. 163–164).

The reasons for its weakness are as follows: