“…Yet we follow the position of ʿAli and Ibn ʿAbbas—may Allah be pleased with them—for the reports have granted a concession to look at her face and hands… (1) so long as the look is not accompanied by desire. If he knows that, were he to look, he would feel desire, then it is unlawful for him to look at any part of her.”
I say: His mention of “ʿAli” is most probably a slip of the pen, or an error introduced by the copyist or the typesetter. Among the reports to which al-Sarakhsi refers we have not found anything traceable to ʿAli; they come from six Companions whose names I have cited earlier (pp. 103–104), among them ʿAʾishah and Ibn ʿUmar. I suspect, therefore, that the word was corrupted from “ʿAʾishah.” The wording of her hadith, as related by al-Bayhaqi (2/226), is:
(Weak) “(What is apparent thereof) means the face and the two hands.”
Its chain is weak, yet it has another route with a similar wording in Ibn Abi Shaybah and others, and it is supported by the statement of Ibn ʿUmar in the form:
(Sound) “The visible adornment is the face and the two hands.”
Ibn Abi Shaybah transmitted it (4/284) with a sound chain from him. He also narrated the same from Ibn ʿAbbas, and its chain is likewise sound.