Al-Siyasa al-Shar'iyyaIbn Taimiya

Another view is that it does not lapse, giving precedence to Allah Most High’s right [أ/ق 67], because there is no equivalence, as with all other prescribed penalties. This is the position of Abū Hanīfa and one report from Ahmad (1).

The prescribed penalty for false accusation of fornication is due only when the accused possesses the requisite legal inviolability—that is, when the person is Muslim, free, and chaste. No prescribed penalty is imposed for accusing someone notorious for sexual immorality, nor for accusing a disbeliever or an enslaved person (2); the accuser is, however, subject to discretionary punishment.

This applies to anyone other than a husband, for he has no need to make such an accusation, even if he is telling the truth. Allah Most High says:

“Indeed, those who love to see immorality spread among the believers will suffer a painful punishment in this world and the Hereafter. Allah knows, while you do not know.” [al-Nūr: 19]

As for (3) the husband, he may accuse his wife if she commits fornication but does not become pregnant by it. If she becomes pregnant by it and gives birth, he must accuse her and disclaim paternity of the child, lest someone who is not his be ascribed to him and thereby become regarded as blood kin to his relatives and as an unmarriageable relative of his womenfolk.

Once he accuses her, she will either confess to fornication or deny it. If she denies it, he may proceed with mutual imprecation against her, as Allah has stated in the Book and as is mentioned in the sunnah.

If the accuser is enslaved, he is liable to half the prescribed penalty imposed on a free person. The same applies to flogging (4) for fornication and drinking, because Allah Most High said concerning enslaved women: “They shall receive half the punishment prescribed for free women.” [al-Nisāʾ: 25] If the required punishment is death or amputation of the hand, however, it cannot be halved.

(1) See Ibn Abī Ya‘lā, *Kitāb al-Tamām*, 2:181; and *al-Mughnī*, 12:386. (2) Manuscripts Yā and Bā read: “and the *zindīq* (heretic)”! (3) The remaining manuscripts read: “except.” (4) Manuscript Zā reads: “hadd (prescribed penalty).”
وقيل: لا يسقط تغليبًا لحق الله تعالى [أ/ق ٦٧] لعدم المماثلة كسائر الحدود، وهو قول أبي حنيفة وأحمد في رواية (١). وإنما يجب حدُّ القذف إذا كان المقذوف محصنًا؛ وهو المسلم، الحر، العفيف، وأما المشهور بالفجور فلا حدَّ على قاذفه، وكذلك الكافر والرقيق (٢)، لكن يُعَزَّر القاذف. وهذا في غير الزوج، إذ لا حاجة به إلى القذف وإن كان صادقًا؛ لأن الله تعالى يقول: ﴿إِنَّ الَّذِينَ يُحِبُّونَ أَنْ تَشِيعَ الْفَاحِشَةُ فِي الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا لَهُمْ عَذَابٌ أَلِيمٌ فِي الدُّنْيَا وَالْآخِرَةِ وَاللَّهُ يَعْلَمُ وَأَنْتُمْ لَا تَعْلَمُونَ﴾ [النور: ١٩]. أما (٣) الزوج فإنه يجوز له أن يقذف المرأة إذا زنت ولم تحبل من الزنا، فإن حَبِلَت منه وولدت، فعليه أن يقذفها وينفي ولدَها، لئلا يلتحق به من ليس منه، ويصير ذا رحم لأقاربه ومَحْرَمًا لنسائه. فإذا قذفها فإما أن تقرَّ هي بالزنا وإما أن تنكر، فإن أنكرت فله أن يلاعنها، كما ذَكر الله في الكتاب، وذُكِر في السنة. ولو كان القاذف عبدًا فعليه نصف حدِّ الحر، وكذلك في جلد (٤) الزنا والشرب؛ لأن الله تعالى قال في الإماء: ﴿فَعَلَيْهِنَّ نِصْفُ مَا عَلَى الْمُحْصَنَاتِ مِنَ الْعَذَابِ﴾ [النساء: ٢٥]، وإذا كان الواجب القتل أو القطع لليد؛ فإنه لا يُنَصَّف.
(١) انظر «كتاب التمام»: (٢/ ١٨١) لابن أبي يعلى، و «المغني»: (١٢/ ٣٨٦). (٢) (ي، ب): «والزنديق»! (٣) بقية النسخ: «إلا». (٤) (ظ): «حد».

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies