Al-Bidayah wa an-NihayahIbn Kathir

What they had newly invented—the punishment of flogging and blackening the face—flatly opposed God’s unequivocal command. They said among themselves, “If he rules for you with flogging and blackening, accept it, and you will have an excuse before God on the Day of Resurrection that a prophet gave this verdict on your behalf. But if he rules for you with stoning, beware of accepting it from him.”

God, exalted be He, condemned them for this corrupt intention, which was driven only by base motives and the following of caprice, not by the true religion. He said:

“How is it that they come to you for judgment when they have the Torah, wherein is God’s judgment? Then they turn away after that; such people are not believers. Indeed, We sent down the Torah containing guidance and light; by it the prophets who had submitted judged for the Jews, as did the rabbis and the scholars, for they were entrusted with the preservation of God’s Book …” (al-Mā’idah 43–44).

For this reason, when the Prophet ﷺ ruled that they be stoned, he said, “O Allah, I am the first to revive Your command after they had allowed it to die.” He asked them what had driven them to this, and why they had abandoned God’s ordinance that was in their very hands. They replied, “Adultery has become widespread among our nobles, and we could not enforce the penalty upon them, though we used to stone those of our lower ranks who committed it. So we said, ‘Come, let us adopt a halfway measure that we can apply to both high and low alike,’ and we agreed upon flogging and blackening the face.”

This is one example of their distortion, alteration, tampering, and false interpretation. They tampered only with the meanings, while the wording about stoning remained in their scripture, as the sound ḥadīth indicates. Hence some scholars said that their alteration affected only the meanings, whereas the wording is still extant and stands as proof against them; for had they upheld everything in their Book, it would have led them to embrace the truth and follow the Messenger Muḥammad ﷺ, as the Exalted said:

“Those who follow the Messenger, the unlettered Prophet, whom they find written with them in the Torah and the Gospel: he enjoins upon them what is right, forbids them from what is wrong, makes lawful for them the good things, forbids them the vile things, and removes from them their burden and the shackles that were upon them …” (the verse).

He also said: “If only they had upheld the Torah and the Gospel and what was sent down to them from their Lord, they would surely have eaten from above them and from beneath their feet …” (al-Mā’idah 66).

And He said: “Say, People of the Scripture, you stand on nothing until you uphold the Torah, the Gospel, and what has been sent down to you from your Lord …” (al-Mā’idah 68).

This view—that the alteration occurred only in the meanings and not in the wording—was reported by al-Bukhārī from Ibn ʿAbbās at the end of his Ṣaḥīḥ, and he transmitted it without rebuttal. The distinguished scholar Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī likewise cited it in his Tafsīr from the majority of theologians. (4) Jurists of the Ḥanafī school held that a person in a state of major ritual impurity is not permitted to touch the Torah while lacking ablution; al-Ḥaṇāṭī mentioned the same view from some adherents of al-Shāfiʿī, though it is exceedingly unusual. Other scholars adopted a middle position between these two views, among them our teacher, the Imām, the erudite scholar Abū’l-ʿAbbās Ibn Taymiyyah—may God sanctify his soul—who said: “As for those who maintain that it …”

(1) In manuscript B: it reads “ibtadʿū” (they innovated). (2) Not present in manuscript T. (3) Not present in manuscript B. (4) In manuscript T, a heading was added to this paragraph: “It is not permissible for the junub to touch the Torah.” This is written in margin A, and it is not mentioned in its main text or in =
ما ابتدعوه (١) من الجلد والتحميم المصادم لما أمر الله به حتمًا وقالوا: إنْ حكم لكم بالجلد والتحميم فاقبلوه وتكونون قد اعتذرتم بحكم نبي لكم عند الله يوم القيامة، وإن لم يحكم لكم بهذا بل بالرجم فاحذروا أن تقبلوا منه. فأنكر اللهُ تعالى عليهم في هذا القصد الفاسد الذي إنما حملهم عليه الغرضُ الفاسد وموافقة الهوى لا الدين الحق فقال: ﴿وَكَيْفَ يُحَكِّمُونَكَ وَعِنْدَهُمُ التَّوْرَاةُ فِيهَا حُكْمُ اللَّهِ ثُمَّ يَتَوَلَّوْنَ مِنْ بَعْدِ ذَلِكَ وَمَا أُولَئِكَ بِالْمُؤْمِنِينَ (٤٣) إِنَّا أَنْزَلْنَا التَّوْرَاةَ فِيهَا هُدًى وَنُورٌ يَحْكُمُ بِهَا النَّبِيُّونَ الَّذِينَ أَسْلَمُوا لِلَّذِينَ هَادُوا وَالرَّبَّانِيُّونَ وَالْأَحْبَارُ بِمَا اسْتُحْفِظُوا مِنْ كِتَابِ اللَّهِ﴾ … الآية [المائدة: ٤٣ - ٤٤] . ولهذا لمّا (٢) حكم بالرجم قال: "اللهم إني أوّل من أحيى أمرك إذْ أماتوه" ، وسألهم ما حَمَلَهُم على هذا؟ ولمَ تركوا أمر الله الذي بأيديهم؟ فقالوا: إن الزنى (٣) قد كثر في أشرافنا ولم يمكنَّا أن نقيمه عليهم، وكنا نرجم من زنى من ضعفائنا، فقلنا: تعالوا إلى أمر نصف نفعله مع الشريف والوضيع، فاصطلحنا على الجلد والتحميم، فهذا من جملة تحريفهم وتبديلهم وتغييرهم وتأويلهم الباطل. وهذا إنما فعلوه في المعاني مع بقاء لفظ الرجم في كتابهم كما دلّ عليه الحديث المتفق عليه، فلهذا قال من قال هذا من الناس إنه لم يقع تبديلهم إلا في المعاني، وإن الألفاظ باقيةٌ وهي حجة عليهم، إذ لو أقاموا ما في كتابهم جميعه لقادهم ذلك إلى اتباع الحق ومتابعة الرسول محمد ﷺ كما قال تعالى: ﴿الَّذِينَ يَتَّبِعُونَ الرَّسُولَ النَّبِيَّ الْأُمِّيَّ الَّذِي يَجِدُونَهُ مَكْتُوبًا عِنْدَهُمْ فِي التَّوْرَاةِ وَالْإِنْجِيلِ يَأْمُرُهُمْ بِالْمَعْرُوفِ وَيَنْهَاهُمْ عَنِ الْمُنْكَرِ وَيُحِلُّ لَهُمُ الطَّيِّبَاتِ وَيُحَرِّمُ عَلَيْهِمُ الْخَبَائِثَ وَيَضَعُ عَنْهُمْ إِصْرَهُمْ وَالْأَغْلَالَ الَّتِي كَانَتْ عَلَيْهِمْ﴾ .. الآية وقال تعالى: ﴿وَلَوْ أَنَّهُمْ أَقَامُوا التَّوْرَاةَ وَالْإِنْجِيلَ وَمَا أُنْزِلَ إِلَيْهِمْ مِنْ رَبِّهِمْ لَأَكَلُوا مِنْ فَوْقِهِمْ وَمِنْ تَحْتِ أَرْجُلِهِمْ﴾ .. الآية [المائدة:٦٦] . وقال تعالى: ﴿قُلْ يَاأَهْلَ الْكِتَابِ لَسْتُمْ عَلَى شَيْءٍ حَتَّى تُقِيمُوا التَّوْرَاةَ وَالْإِنْجِيلَ وَمَا أُنْزِلَ إِلَيْكُمْ مِنْ رَبِّكُمْ﴾ … الآية [المائدة: ٦٨] . وهذا المذهب، وهو القول بأن التبديل إنما وقع في معانيها لا في ألفاظها، حكاه البخاري عن ابن عباس في آخر كتابه "الصحيح" وقرَّر عليه ولم يردَّه. وحكاه العلامة فخر الدين الرازي في "تفسيره" عن أكثر المتكلمين. (٤) وذهب فقهاء الحنفية إلى أنه لا يجوز للجنب مَسُّ التوراة وهو مُحْدِث. وحكاه الحنَّاطي في "فتاويه" عن بعض أصحاب الشافعي، وهو غريب جدًا. وذهب آخرون من العلماء إلى التوسُّط في هذين القولين، منهم شيخُنا الإمام العلامة أبو العباس بن تَيْمِية (رحمه الله) فقال: أمّا من ذهب إلى أنها
(١) في ب: ابتدعوا. (٢) ليست في ط. (٣) ليست في ب. (٤) زاد في ط عنوانًا لهذه الفقرة: ليس للجنب لمس التوراة. وهو مكتوب في حاشية أ، وليس له ذكر في متنها أو في =

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies