Al-Bidayah wa an-NihayahIbn Kathir

“It is not a creator.”

He said, “That is not what I am asking you about either.”

He replied, “I do not know how to say anything else,” and he would not budge.

He (Ishaq) then asked, “Do you testify that there is no deity but Allah, the One, the Unique; that nothing existed before Him and nothing will exist after Him; and that none of His creation resembles Him in any attribute whatsoever or in any respect?”

“Yes,” he answered.
So Ishaq told the scribe, “Write down what he has said,” and the scribe did so.

He then examined them one by one. Most of them refused to say that the Quran is created. Whenever a man balked, Ishaq would test him with the written statement (1) to which Bishr ibn al-Walid al-Kindi had agreed—that Allah resembles nothing in His creation in any attribute whatsoever or in any respect—and the man would reply, “Yes, exactly as Bishr said.”

When the turn came to question Ahmad ibn Hanbal, Ishaq asked, “Do you say that the Quran is created?”

He replied, “The Quran is the Speech of Allah; I will add nothing to that.”

Ishaq said, “Then what do you say about this written statement?”

Ahmad answered by reciting, “There is nothing like unto Him, and He is the All-Hearing, the All-Seeing” (Surah al-Shura 42:11).

A man from the Muʿtazilah objected, “He is saying that Allah hears with an ear and sees with an eye!”

Ishaq said to Ahmad, “What did you intend by your words ‘All-Hearing, All-Seeing’?”

He replied, “I intended only what Allah intended; He is exactly as He has described Himself, and I will add nothing beyond that.”

The answers of the assemblage were then written down—each man’s answer separately (2)—and sent to al-Maʾmun.

[Section]

It has already been mentioned that when Ishaq ibn Ibrahim, the governor of Baghdad, examined the group regarding the doctrine that the Quran is created and the denial of resemblance, they all agreed to deny likeness. As for declaring the Quran created, they refused, all of them saying, “The Quran is the Speech of Allah.”

Imam Ahmad said, “I will never add another letter to that,” and, to underscore the denial of likeness, he recited, “There is nothing like unto Him, and He is the All-Hearing, the All-Seeing” (42:11).

They asked, “What did you mean by saying ‘the All-Hearing, the All-Seeing’?”

He replied, “I meant by it only what Allah meant.”

Some of those present did agree to the doctrine that the Quran is created, trying to placate the authorities under duress, for anyone who refused was removed from his post; if he drew a stipend from the public treasury it was cut off; if he was a mufti he was forbidden to issue rulings; if he was a hadith teacher he was prevented from transmitting and teaching.

Thus a deafening fitna broke out, a monstrous ordeal, an overwhelming calamity—there is no power and no strength except with Allah, the Most High, the Almighty, the All-Wise.

The governor, Ishaq ibn Ibrahim, ordered the scribe to record each man’s reply verbatim and to send it to

(1) In manuscripts Zā and B: “bimā fī ar-ruqaʿa” (as in the draft). (2) In the ṭ edition: “rajulan rajulan” (man by man).
ليس بخالق. قال: ولا عن هذا أسألك. فقال: ما أُحسن غيرَ هذا. وصمَّم على ذلك. فقال: أتشهد أن لا إلَه إلا اللَّه أحدًا فردًا، لم يكن قبله شيء ولا بعده شيء، ولا يشبهه شيء من خلقه في معنى من المعاني ولا وجهٍ من الوجوه؟ قال: نعم! فقال للكاتب: اكتب بما قال. فكتب. ثم امتحنهم رجلًا رجلًا، فأكثرُهم امتنَعَ من القول بخلق القرآن، وإذا مانع الرجل منهم يمتحنه بالرقعة (١) التي وافق عليها بِشْرُ بن الوليد الكِنديّ؛ من أنه تعالى لا يشبهه شيء من خلقه في معنًى من المعاني ولا وجهٍ من الوجوه، فيقول: نعم، كما قال [بِشر] . ولما انتهت النوبةُ إلى امتحان أحمد بن حنبل، قال له: أتقولُ إن القرآن مخلوق؟ فقال: القرآن كلامُ اللَّه، لا أزيد على هذا. قال: فما تقول في هذه الرقعة؟ فقال: ﴿لَيْسَ كَمِثْلِهِ شَيْءٌ وَهُوَ السَّمِيعُ الْبَصِيرُ﴾ [الشورى: ١١] . فقال رجلٌ من المعتزلة: إنه يقول: سميع بأُذن، بصير بعين. فقال له [إسحاق] : ما أردْتَ بقولك: سميع بصيرٌ؟ فقال: أردت منها ما أرادَه اللَّهُ منها، وهو كما وَصَفَ نفسَه، ولا أزيدُ على ذلك. فكُتبتْ جواباتُ القوم، رجل (٢) رجل، وبعث بها إلى المأمون. [فصل] قد تقدَّم: أن إسحاق بن إبراهيم نائب بغداد لمَّا امتحن الجماعة في القول بخلق القرآن، ونفي التشبيه، فأجابوا كلُّهم إلى نفي المماثلة. وأما القولُ بخلق القرآن فامتنعوا من ذلك، وقالوا كلهم: القرآن كلام اللَّه. قال الإمام أحمد: ولا أزيدُ على هذا حَرْفًا أبدًا، وقرأ في نفي المماثلة: ﴿لَيْسَ كَمِثْلِهِ شَيْءٌ وَهُوَ السَّمِيعُ الْبَصِيرُ﴾ [الشورى: ١١] ، فقالوا: ما أردْتَ بقولك: السَّميع البصير؟ فقال: أردْتُ منها ما أراد اللَّه منها. وكان من الحاضرين من أجاب إلى القول بخلق القرآن مُصانعة مكرهًا؛ لأنَّهم كانوا يعزِلون مَن لا يجيبُ عن وظائفه، وإن كان له رِزْقٌ على بيت المال قُطِعَ، وإن كان مفتيًا مُنع من الإفتاء، وإن كان شيخَ حديثٍ، رُدِعَ عن الإسماع والأداء. ووقعت فتنة صمَّاء، ومحنة شنعاء، وداهية دهياء، فلا حولَ ولا قوَّة إلا باللَّه العلي العظيم، العزيز الحكيم. وأمر النائبُ إسحاق بن إبراهيم للكاتب فكتب عن كُلِّ واحدٍ منهم جوابه بعينه، وبعث به إلى
(١) ظا، ب: بما في الرقعة. (٢) في ط: رجلًا رجلًا.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies