Al-Bidayah wa an-NihayahIbn Kathir

God Most High says: “We did not send down upon his people, after him, any army from heaven, nor were We ever going to send one.” In other words, We had no need, when exacting retribution, to dispatch celestial troops against them. This is the meaning conveyed in the report transmitted by Ibn Isḥāq—through some of his teachers—from Ibn Masʿūd.

Mujāhid and Qatādah said that the phrase “nor did We send down a host” means: We did not send them another message. Ibn Jarīr held the first explanation to be preferable, and I consider it the stronger view. Hence His words, “nor were We ever going to send one,” that is, We had no need of such measures when they denied Our messengers and killed Our devoted servant. “It was but one mighty Blast, and suddenly they were extinguished.”

The exegetes relate that God sent Gabriel, peace be upon him; he grasped the two door-posts of the city gate and gave a single cry. Instantly they were extinguished—their voices silenced, their movements stilled, not an eye among them so much as flickered.

All of this shows that the town in question was not Antioch, for those people were destroyed for rejecting God’s messengers, whereas the inhabitants of Antioch believed and followed the messengers of the Messiah sent to them from among the disciples. For this reason it is said that Antioch was the first city to believe in the Messiah.

As for the ḥadīth reported by al-Ṭabarānī—through Ḥusayn al-Ashqar, from Sufyān ibn ʿUyaynah, from Ibn Abī Najīḥ, from Mujāhid, from Ibn ʿAbbās, from the Prophet ﷺ—who is quoted as saying:

“The forerunners are three: the one who hastened to Moses was Yūshaʿ ibn Nūn; the one who hastened to Jesus is the Companion of Yāsīn; and the one who hastened to Muhammad is ʿAlī ibn Abī Ṭālib,”

this ḥadīth is not authentic. Ḥusayn al-Ashqar has been deemed unreliable and was an extremist Shīʿī, and his solitary transmission of this report is clear evidence of its complete weakness. God knows best.

(1) Recorded by Muhammad ibn Jarir al-Tabari in his at-Tafsir, vol. 10, p. 437. (2) See Muhammad ibn Jarir al-Tabari’s at-Tafsir, vol. 10, p. 437. (3) Recorded by al-Tabarani in al-Kabir, vol. 22, p. 11152.
تعالى: ﴿وَمَا أَنْزَلْنَا عَلَى قَوْمِهِ مِنْ بَعْدِهِ مِنْ جُنْدٍ مِنَ السَّمَاءِ وَمَا كُنَّا مُنْزِلِينَ﴾ أي: ما احتجنا في الانتقام منهم إلى إنزال جُنْدٍ من السماء عليهم، هذا معنى ما رواه ابن إسحاق (١) : عن بعض أصحابه، عن ابن مسعود. وقال مجاهد وقتادة: وما أنزلَ عليهم جُنْدًا، أي: رسالةً أخرى. قال ابن جرير (٢) : والأوَّلُ أولى. قلت: وأقوى. ولهذا قال: ﴿وَمَا كُنَّا مُنْزِلِينَ﴾ أي: وما كنا نحتاجُ في الانتقام إلى هذا حين كذَّبوا رسلنا، وقتلوا وَليَّنا ﴿إِنْ كَانَتْ إِلَّا صَيْحَةً وَاحِدَةً فَإِذَا هُمْ خَامِدُونَ﴾. قال المفسرون: بعثَ الله إليهم جبريلَ (عليه السلام) ، فأخذَ بعضادتي الباب الذي لبلدهم، ثم صاحَ بهم صيحةً واحدةً فإذا هم خامدون، أي: قد أُخمدتْ أصواتُهم، وسكنتْ حركاتُهم، ولم يبق منهم عينٌ تَطْرُفُ. وهذا كلُّه مما يدلُّ على أن هذه القرية ليست أنطاكية، لأن هؤلاء أُهلكوا بتكذيبهم رسلَ الله إليهم، وأهل أنطاكية آمنوا واتَّبعوا رسلَ المسيح من الحواريِّين إليهم، فلهذا قيل: إن أنطاكية أوَّلُ مدينة آمنتْ بالمسيح. فأما الحديث الذي رواه الطبراني: من حديث حسين الأشقر، عن سُفيان بن عُيينة، عن ابن أبي نجيح، عن مُجاهد، عن ابن عبَّاس، عن النبي ﷺ قال: "السَّبْقُ ثلاثة: فالسابق إلى موسى يُوشع بن نون، والسابقُ إلى عيسى صاحب يس، والسابق إلى محمد عليُّ بن أبي طالب" (٣) فإنه حديث لا يثبتُ، لأن حُسينًا هذا متروك وشيعيٌّ من الغلاة، وتفرده بهذا مما يدلُّ على ضعفه بالكليَّة، والله أعلم.
(١) أخرجه ابن جرير في التفسير (١٠/ ٤٣٧). (٢) انظر تفسير ابن جرير الطبري (١٠/ ٤٣٧). (٣) أخرجه الطبراني في الكبير (٢٢/ ١١١٥٢).

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies