Al-Bidayah wa an-NihayahIbn Kathir

“You are mistaken; you have already slain my father’s killer, but it is your uncle al-Fākih ibn al-Mughīrah for whom you are taking revenge.” A quarrel thus broke out between them, and news of it reached the Messenger of God ﷺ, who said:

“Easy, Khālid; leave my Companions alone. By God, even if you owned the mountain of Uḥud in gold and spent it in the cause of God, you would still not equal a single morning or evening’s deed of one of my Companions.”

Ibn Isḥāq (1) then recounts the story of al-Fākih ibn al-Mughīrah ibn ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿUmar ibn Makhzūm, the paternal uncle of Khālid ibn al-Walīd. Al-Fākih set out with ʿAwf ibn ʿAbd ʿAwf (2) ibn ʿAbd al-Ḥārith ibn Zuhrah—accompanied by his son ʿAbd al-Raḥmān—and with ʿAffān ibn Abī al-ʿĀṣ ibn Umayyah ibn ʿAbd Shams—accompanied by his son ʿUthmān—on a trading journey to Yemen. On their return they were carrying property that belonged to a man of Banū Jadhīmah who had died in Yemen and which they intended to deliver to his heirs.

A man from Banū Jadhīmah named Khālid ibn Hishām claimed the property for himself. He met them in the territory of Banū Jadhīmah and demanded it before they could reach the deceased man’s family. When they refused, he attacked them and they fought back until ʿAwf and al-Fākih were killed and their goods seized. ʿAbd al-Raḥmān killed his father’s killer, Khālid ibn Hishām, while ʿAffān and his son ʿUthmān fled to Mecca. Quraysh then considered marching against Banū Jadhīmah, but Banū Jadhīmah sent delegations to apologize, declaring that the affair had not been authorized by their leaders. They paid the blood-money for the two slain men and for the confiscated property, and hostilities were averted.

It was for this reason that Khālid ibn al-Walīd said to ʿAbd al-Raḥmān, “I was only avenging your father,” referring to the time when Banū Jadhīmah had killed him. ʿAbd al-Raḥmān replied that he had already taken his revenge and slain the murderer, adding that Khālid was in fact avenging his own uncle al-Fākih ibn al-Mughīrah, who had been killed and robbed of his wealth. It is presumed of both men that they were not truly motivated by such desires; these remarks were uttered in the heat of dispute.

In reality, Khālid ibn al-Walīd sought only to champion Islam and its people, even though he erred in this affair. He assumed that the people were denigrating Islam by their words “ṣaba’nā, ṣaba’nā,” failing to understand that they meant, “We have embraced Islam.” He therefore killed many of them, took the rest captive, and later executed most of the captives as well. Despite this, the Messenger of God ﷺ did not relieve him of command; rather, he kept him in office, although he disavowed Khālid’s deed and paid compensation for every life or property wrongfully taken. This provides evidence for the legal opinion held by some scholars that the imam’s inadvertent errors are compensated from the public treasury rather than from his personal wealth—and God knows best.

For the same reason Abū Bakr al-Ṣiddīq did not dismiss him when he executed Mālik ibn Nuwairah during the Ridda wars, interpreting Khālid’s action when he struck off his head and married his wife, Umm Tamīm, in a similar light. ʿUmar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb said to Abū Bakr, “Remove him, for there is rashness in his sword,” but Abū Bakr replied, “I will not sheath a sword that God has unsheathed against the idolaters.” (3)

Ibn Isḥāq (4) also said: “Yaʿqūb ibn ʿUtbah ibn al-Mughīrah ibn al-Akhnas related to me, from al-Zuhrī, from Ibn Abī—"

(1) See Ibn Hisham, as-Sirah an-Nabawiyyah, vol. 2, p. 431. (2) This is printed in the edition of Ibn Hisham’s as-Sirah an-Nabawiyyah before me and in ar-Rawḍ al-Anf, vol. 7, p. 129, as “Wa‘ūf ibn ‘Abd Munāf,” which is incorrect; the correct reading is that given in our text. See also Ibn Hazm, Jamharat Ansab al-‘Arab, p. 131. (3) For further reference, consult Ibn al-‘Imād al-Hanbalī’s account of this incident in Shadharāt al-Dhahab, vol. 1, pp. 135–136 (in my critical edition). (4) See Ibn Hisham, as-Sirah an-Nabawiyyah, vol. 2, p. 433.
كذبتَ، قد قتلت قاتل أبي، ولكنك ثأرتَ بعمِّك الفاكه بن المغيرة. حتى كان بينهما شرٌّ، فبلغ ذلك رسولَ الله ﷺ فقال: "مهلًا يا خالد، دع عنك أصحابي، فوالله لو كان لك أُحُدٌ ذهبًا ثم أنفقتَه في سبيل الله، ما أدركتَ غَدوة رجل من أصحابي ولا رَوحتَه" . ثم ذكر ابن إسحاق (١) قصة الفَاكِه بن المغيرة بن عبد الله بن عمر بن مخزوم، عمِّ خالد بن الوليد، في خروجه هو وعوف بن عبد عوف (٢) بن عبد الحارث بن زُهرة، ومعه ابنه عبد الرحمن، وعَفَّان بن أبي العاص بن أمية بن عبد شمس، ومعه ابنه عثمان في تجارة إلى اليمن، ورجوعهم، ومعهم مال لرجل من بني جذيمة كان هلك باليمن، فحملوه إلى ورثته، فادَّعاه رجل منهم يقال له: خالد بن هشام. ولقيهم بأرض بني جذيمة فطلبه منهم قبل أن يصلوا إلى أهل الميِّت، فأبوا عليه، فقاتلهم فقاتلوه، حتى قتل عَوف والفاكه وأخذت أموالهما، وقتل عبد الرحمن قاتل أبيه خالد بن هشام، وفرَّ منهم عفَّان ومعه ابنه عثمان إلى مكة، فهمَّت قريش بغزو بني جَذيمة، فبعثت بنو جَذيمة يعتذرون إليهم بأنه لم يكن عن ملأ منهم، وودَوا لهم القتيلين وأموالهما، ووضعوا الحرب بينهم. يعني فلهذا قال خالد بن الوليد لعبد الرحمن: إنما ثأرتُ بأبيك. يعني حين قتلته بنو جَذيمة، فأجابه بانه قد أخذ ثأره وقتل قاتله، وردَّ عليه بانه إنما ثأر بعمِّه الفاكه بن المغيرة حين قتلوه وأخذوا أمواله، والمظنون بكل منهما أنه لم يقصد شيئًا من ذلك، وإنما يُقال هذا في وقت المخاصمة، فإنما أراد خالد بن الوليد نُصرة الإسلام وأهله، وإن كان قد أخطأ في أمر، واعتقد أنهم ينتقصون الإسلام بقولهم: صبأنا صبأنا. ولم يفهم عنهم أنهم أسلموا، فقتل طائفة كثيرة منهم وأسر بقيَّتهم، وقتل أكثر الأسرى أيضًا، ومع هذا لم يعزله رسول الله ﷺ ، بل استمرَّ به أميرًا، وإن كان قد تبرَّأ منه في صنيعه ذلك، وودَى ما كان جناه خطأ في دمٍ أو مالٍ، ففيه دليلٌ لأحد القولين بين العلماء في أن خطأ الإمام يكون في بيت المال لا في ماله، والله أعلم، ولهذا لم يعزله الصِّدِّيق حين قتل مالك بن نُوَيْرَة أيام الرِّدَّة، وتأوَّل عليه ما تأوَّل حين ضرب عنقه واصطفى امرأته أمَّ تميم، فقال له عمر بن الخطاب: اعزله؛ فإن في سيفه رهقا. فقال الصديق: لا أغمد سيفًا سلَّه الله على المشركين (٣) . وقال ابن إسحاق (٤) : حدَّثني يعقوب بن عتبة بن المغيرة بن الأخنس، عن الزهريِّ، عن ابن أبي
(١) انظر "السيرة النبوية" لابن هشام (٢/ ٤٣١). (٢) مطبوع في "السيرة النبوية" لابن هشام الذي بين يدي و"الروض الأنف" (٧/ ١٢٩): "وعوف بن عبد مناف" وهو خطأ، والصواب ما في كتابنا هنا. وانظر "جمهرة أنساب العرب" لابن حزم ص (١٣١). (٣) لتمام الفائدة راجع ما ذكره ابن العماد الحنبلي في هذه القصة في "شذرات الذهب" (١/ ١٣٥ - ١٣٦) بتحقيقي. (٤) انظر "السيرة النبوية" لابن هشام (٢/ ٤٣٣).

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies