Al-Bidayah wa an-NihayahIbn Kathir

Ibn Isḥāq (1) said: They remained in that state for two or three years, until hardship wore them down, and nothing reached them except what was smuggled in secretly by any of the Quraysh who wished to maintain ties with them.

It is related that Abū Jahl ibn Hishām once met Ḥakīm ibn Ḥizām ibn Khuwaylid ibn Asad, who was accompanied by a servant carrying wheat intended for his aunt Khadījah bint Khuwaylid—she being with the Messenger of Allah ﷺ in the ravine. Abū Jahl grabbed hold of him, saying, “Are you taking food to the Banū Hāshim? By God, neither you nor your food will move from here until I disgrace you in Mecca!”

Abū’l-Bukhturī ibn Hishām ibn al-Ḥārith ibn Asad came forward and asked, “What business have you with him?” Abū Jahl replied, “He is transporting food to the Banū Hāshim.” Abū’l-Bukhturī said, “It is food that his aunt had with him and sent him to bring her. Will you stop him from delivering her provisions? Let the man go.”

Abū Jahl—may Allah curse him—refused, and the two traded insults. Abū’l-Bukhturī picked up a camel’s jawbone, struck him with it, split his head, and trampled him severely. Ḥamzah ibn ‘Abd al-Muṭṭalib was close by and saw what happened. They all dreaded the incident reaching the Messenger of Allah ﷺ and his Companions, for then they would rejoice at the Quraysh’s misfortune.

All the while, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ continued to summon his people night and day, in secret and openly, publicly proclaiming Allah’s command (2), fearing no one among mankind.

When Allah thus protected him from them, and his uncle and his clan—the Banū Hāshim and Banū ‘Abd al-Muṭṭalib (3)—stood between him and the violence they intended, the Quraysh turned to taunting, mocking, and disputing with him. Meanwhile, the Qur’an was being revealed concerning their deeds and those who set themselves up as his enemies—some of them named explicitly, others addressed collectively among the disbelievers Allah mentioned.

Ibn Isḥāq (4) listed among these: Abū Lahab, for whom an entire sūrah was revealed; Umayyah ibn Khalaf, at whom the verse “Woe to every slanderer, backbiter” (al-Humazah 1) —indeed the whole sūrah—was directed; and al-‘Āṣ ibn Wā’il, addressed by the verse, “Have you seen the one who rejects Our signs and says, ‘I shall surely be given wealth and children’” (Maryam 77), as noted earlier.

He also mentioned Abū Jahl ibn Hishām, who said to the Prophet ﷺ, “You will stop reviling our gods, or we will revile yours,” whereupon Allah revealed: “Do not revile those they invoke besides Allah, lest they revile Allah out of hostility, without knowledge” (al-An‘ām 108). He further cited al-Naḍr ibn al-Ḥārith ibn Kaladah ibn ‘Alqamah (5): after the Prophet ﷺ finished his gatherings in which he recited the Qur’an and called people to Allah, al-Naḍr would sit in the same place and recite to them tales of Rustam and Isfandiyār and the wars fought between them in the era of the Persians, then say, “By God, Muḥammad’s stories are no better than mine, and his discourse is nothing …”

(1) Ibn Hisham’s Sirah (vol. 1, p. 353) and al-Rawd (vol. 2, p. 103). (2) In the printed edition it reads munadiyan bi-amr Allah (calling to the command of God), which is confirmed in the ḥ manuscript. (3) In both al-Sirah and al-Rawd it reads wa-bani al-Mutlab. (4) In Ibn Hisham’s Sirah (vol. 1, pp. 356–360). (5) In the printed edition, between two marginal obeli, there is the following addition: “And some say ‘Alqama ibn Kildah,’ as reported by al-Suhayli.” This addition is absent from the ḥ manuscript and likely originates with later copyists, since al-Suhayli first preserves Ibn Hisham’s text verbatim and then comments in al-Rawd (vol. 2, p. 115): “He states in his genealogy ‘Kildah ibn Alqama,’ while other genealogists say ‘Alqama ibn Kildah.’” I also found this in the marginal notes of Shaykh Abu Bahr’s Kitab ’an al-Walīd. See Ibn Hazm, Jamharat al-Ansab (p. 126).
قال ابن إسحاق (١) : فأقاموا على ذلك سنتَيْن أو ثلاثًا حتى جُهدوا، ولم يصلْ إليهمِ شيءٌ إلا سرًا مستخفيًا به مَنْ أراد صِلَتَهُمْ من قريش. وقد كان أبو جهل بنُ هشام -فيما يذكرون- لَقِي حَكيمَ بنَ حِزَام بن خُويلد بن أسد معه غلامٌ يحمل قمحًا، يُريد به عمَّتهُ خَدِيجة بنت خُويلد، وهي عند رسولِ الله ﷺ في الشِّعْب، فتعلَّق به وقال: أتذهبُ بالطعام إلى بني هاشم؟ والله لا تذهب أنت وطعامك حتى أفضحك بمكة. فجاءه أبو البَخْتَرِيِّ بنُ هشام بن الحارث بن أسد فقال: ما لك وله؟ فقال: يحمِلُ الطعام إلى بني هاشم. فقال له أبو البختريّ: طعامٌ كان لعمَّتِه عنده بعثتْ به إليه أتمنعه أنْ يأتيَها بطعامها؟ خلِّ سبيلَ الرجل. قال: فأبَى أبو جهل لعنه الله حتى نالَ أحدُهما من صاحبه، فأخذ أبو البختريِّ لَحْيَ بعيرٍ فضربه، فشجَّهُ ووطِئَهُ وطْئًا شديدًا، وحمزةُ بن عبد المطلب قريبٌ يرى ذلك، وهم يكرهون أن يبلغ ذلك رسولَ الله ﷺ وأصحابَه فيشمتون بهم، ورسولُ الله ﷺ على ذلك يدعو قومَهُ ليلًا ونهارًا وسِرًّا وإعلانًا وجهارًا مُبَاديا لأمر (٢) الله تعالى، لا يتقي فيه أحدًا من الناس. فجعلت قريشٌ حين منعَهُ الله منها وقام عمُّه وقومُه من بني هاشم وبني عبد المطلب (٣) دونه وحالُوا بينهم وبين ما أرادوا من البَطْش به، يهمزونه ويستهزئون به ويخاصمونه وجعل القرآنُ ينزلُ في قريش بأحداثهم وفيمن نَصَبَ لعداوته، منهم من سُمّي لنا، ومنهم من نزل القرآن في عامَّةِ مَنْ ذكر الله من الكفار. فذكر ابن إسحاق (٤) أبا لهب ونزولَ السورةِ فيه، وأُميَّة بن خلف ونزول قوله تعالى: ﴿وَيْلٌ لِكُلِّ هُمَزَةٍ لُمَزَةٍ﴾ [الهمزة: ١] السورة بكمالها فيه. والعاص بن وائل ونزول قوله: ﴿أَفَرَأَيْتَ الَّذِي كَفَرَ بِآيَاتِنَا وَقَالَ لَأُوتَيَنَّ مَالًا وَوَلَدًا﴾ [مريم: ٧٧] فيه. وقد تقدَّم شيءٌ من ذلك. وأبا جهل بن هشام وقولهُ للنبيِّ ﷺ لتَتْرُكَنَّ سبَّ آلهتِنا أو لنسبَّنَّ آلهتك، ونزول قول الله فيه ﴿وَلَا تَسُبُّوا الَّذِينَ يَدْعُونَ مِنْ دُونِ اللَّهِ فَيَسُبُّوا اللَّهَ عَدْوًا بِغَيْرِ عِلْمٍ﴾ [الأنعام: ١٠٨] الآية. والنَّضْر بن الحارث بن كَلَدة بن علقمة (٥) ، وجلوسه بعد النبي ﷺ في مجالسه حيث يتلو القرآن، ويدعو إلى الله، فيتلو عليهم النضْرُ شيئًا من أخبار رستم واسفنديار، وما جرى بينهما من الحروب في زمنِ الفرس، ثم يقول: والله ما محمدٌ بأحسنَ حديثًا مني، وما حديثُه
(١) سيرة ابن هشام (١/ ٣٥٣) والروض (٢/ ١٠٣). (٢) في ط: مناديًا بأمر الله، والمثبت من ح. (٣) في السيرة والروض: وبني المطلب. (٤) في سيرة ابن هشام (١/ ٣٥٦ - ٣٦٠). (٥) زادت ط بين معترضتين ما نصه: ومنهم من يقول علقمة بن كلدة قاله السهيلي. وليست هذه الزيادة في ح ولعلها من النساخ لأن السهيلي أثبت نص ابن هشام كما هو ثم علق عليه بقوله الروض (٢/ ١١٥): وقال في نسبه: كلدة بن علقمة، وغيره من النساب يقول: علقمة بن كلدة، وكذلك ألفيته في حاشية كتاب الشيخ أبي بحر عن الوليد. اهـ. جمهرة الأنساب لابن حزم (ص ١٢٦).

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies