Al-Bidayah wa an-NihayahIbn Kathir

“The Arabs will soon arrive for the coming season, and they have already heard about your companion. Therefore, agree on one unified position concerning him; do not differ, lest you contradict one another and each of your words refute the other.”

They said, “Abu ʿAbd Shams, speak up and formulate for us a view we can adopt.”

He replied, “No—rather, you speak and I will listen.”

They suggested, “Shall we say he is a soothsayer?”

He answered, “He is not a soothsayer. I have seen soothsayers, and what he says is nothing like their whispered murmuring.”

They said, “Shall we say he is mad?”

He replied, “He is not mad. We have observed madness and recognized it, and there is nothing in what he says of choking fits, convulsive movements, or deranged whisperings.”

They said, “Shall we say he is a poet?”

He said, “He is not a poet. We know poetry in all its metres—its rajaz, its hazaj, its qasid, its short and its long forms—and what he says is not poetry.”

They said, “Then shall we say he is a sorcerer?”

He answered, “He is not a sorcerer. We have seen sorcerers and their sorcery, and there is none of their blowing or knot-tying in what he says.”

They asked, “So what shall we say, Abu ʿAbd Shams?”

He replied, “By Allah, his speech is indeed sweet; its root is abundant and its branches bear ripe fruit. Whatever you say about it will be recognised as false. The nearest allegation you can make is to say that he is a sorcerer. So say: ‘He is a sorcerer who separates a man from his religion, a man from his father, a man from his wife, a man from his brother, and a man from his clan.’ ”

They dispersed on that basis and, when the pilgrimage season came, they sat along the roads; no one passed by them without their warning him about the Prophet and repeating their charge.

Concerning al-Walid, Allah revealed:
“Leave Me alone with the one I created single-handedly,
to whom I granted abundant wealth
and sons ever at his side…” (al-Muddaththir 74:11–13) and the subsequent verses.

And regarding that group He said:
“Those who have broken the Qur’an into parts.
By your Lord, We will surely question them all
about what they used to do.” (al-Hijr 15:91–93)

The author says:
In connection with this, Almighty Allah also said—exposing their ignorance and lack of sense—
“Rather, they say, ‘[It is] confused dreams! Rather, he has fabricated it! Rather, he is a poet! Then let him bring us a sign like those that were sent to the former peoples.’ ” (al-Anbiyaʾ 21:5)

They were utterly bewildered as to what to say about him, and everything they claimed was false, for whoever departs from the truth, whatever he says is in error.

Allah the Exalted said:
“See how they coin comparisons for you and thereby go astray, and cannot find a way.” (al-Israʾ 17:48; al-Furqan 25:9)

Imam ʿAbd ibn Ḥumayd related in his Musnad: Abu Bakr ibn Abi Shaybah told us, saying: ʿAli ibn Mushir narrated to us from al-Ajlah—who is Ibn ʿAbd Allah al-Kindi—from al-Dhiyyal ibn Harmalah al-Asadi, from Jabir ibn ʿAbd Allah, who said:
“Quraysh gathered one day and said, ‘Find the one among you who is most knowledgeable about sorcery, soothsaying, and poetry. Let him go to this man who has divided our community, scattered our affairs, and reviled our religion; let him speak with him and see what reply he receives.’
They said, ‘We know no one for this task except ʿUtbah ibn Rabiʿah.’”

(1) In H: “And indeed for its branch.” In Dalail al-Nubuwwa: “Indeed its branch is a jinn.” (2) In H: “I know.” (3) As found in H, the printed edition, and in Dalail al-Nubuwwa; the correct reading is perhaps “fa-taquluna” (so you say). (4) Ibn Hajar mentions it in al-Matalib al-Alya (no. 4285) and records it as “to Abu Bakr, to Abu Ya‘la, and to Abd ibn Humayd.” In the new edition its isnad is number 4229. Al-Hakim also narrates it in al-Mustadrak (2/253) and declares its chain authentic, though he did not include it in his main collection. Al-Haythami cites it in al-Majma‘ (6/19–20), noting that Abu Ya‘la transmitted it; it includes al-Ajlah al-Kindi, whom Ibn Mu‘in and others deemed reliable while al-Nasa’i and others judged him weak, and the rest of the narrators are trustworthy. (5) In his Musannaf (no. 18409), Book of Maghazi, chapter on the harm inflicted by the Quraysh on the Prophet (peace be upon him). (6) In H: “alladhi qad farraqa” (which has been separated); this addition does not appear in the printed edition nor in Abu Bakr ibn Abi Shaybah’s Musannaf.
العرب ستقدمُ عليكم فيه، وقد سمعوا بأمر صاحبكم هذا، فأجمعوا فيه رأيًا واحدًا ولا تختلفوا، فيكذِّب بعضُكم بعضًا، ويردُّ قولُ بعضكم بعضًا. فقيل: يا أبا عبد شمس، فقُلْ، وأقِمْ لنا رأيًا نقومُ به. فقال: بل أنتم فقولوا وأنا أسمع. فقالوا: نقولُ كاهن؟ فقال ما هو بكاهن، رأيتُ الكُهَّان، فما هو بزَمْزَمة الكُهَّان. فقالوا: نقول مجنون؟ فقال ما هو بمجنون، ولقد رأينا الجنون وعرفناه، فما هو بخَنْقِه ولا تَخَالُجِهِ ولا وسوسته. فقالوا: نقول شاعر؟ فقال: ما هو بشاعر، قد عرفنا الشعر بِرَجَزِه وهَزَجِه وقَرِيضه ومَقْبوضه ومبسوطه، فما هو بالشعر. قالوا: فنقول هو ساحر؟ قال ما هو بساحر، قد رأينا السُّحَّار وسِحْرَهم، فما هو بنَفْثِه ولا بعَقْدِه. قالوا: فما نقولُ يا أبا عبد شمس؟ قال: والله إن لقوله لحلاوة، وإن أصله لمُغْدق، وإنَّ فَرْعَهُ لجنيّ (١) ، فما أنتم بقائلين من هذا شيئًا إلا عُرف (٢) أنه باطل؛ وإنَّ أقربَ القول لأنْ تقولوا ساحر، فتقولوا (٣) : هو ساحرٌ يفرِّقُ بين المرء ودينه، وبين المرء وأبيه، وبين المرء وزوجته، وبين المرء وأخيه، وبين المرء وعشيرته. فتفرَّقوا عنه بذلك، فجعلوا يجلسون للناس حين قدِموا المَوْسم، لا يمرُّ بهم أحَدٌ إلا حذَّرُوهُ إيَّاه، وذكروا لهم أمره، وأنزل الله في الوليد: ﴿ذَرْنِي وَمَنْ خَلَقْتُ وَحِيدًا (١١) وَجَعَلْتُ لَهُ مَالًا مَمْدُودًا (١٢) وَبَنِينَ شُهُودًا﴾ [المدثر: ١١ - ١٣] الآيات. وفي أولئك النَّفرِ: ﴿الَّذِينَ جَعَلُوا الْقُرْآنَ عِضِينَ (٩١) فَوَرَبِّكَ لَنَسْأَلَنَّهُمْ أَجْمَعِينَ (٩٢) عَمَّا كَانُوا يَعْمَلُونَ﴾ [الحجر: ٩١ - ٩٣] . قلت: وفي ذلك قال الله تعالى أخبارًا عن جهلهم وقِلَّةِ عقلهم ﴿بَلْ قَالُوا أَضْغَاثُ أَحْلَامٍ بَلِ افْتَرَاهُ بَلْ هُوَ شَاعِرٌ فَلْيَأْتِنَا بِآيَةٍ كَمَا أُرْسِلَ الْأَوَّلُونَ﴾ [الأنبياء: ٥] فحارُوا ماذا يقولون فيه، فكلُّ شيءٍ يقولونه باطل، لأن مَنْ خرج عن الحق مهما قاله أخطأ. قال الله تعالى: ﴿انْظُرْ كَيْفَ ضَرَبُوا لَكَ الْأَمْثَالَ فَضَلُّوا فَلَا يَسْتَطِيعُونَ سَبِيلًا﴾ [الإسراء: ٤٨، الفرقان: ٩] . وقال الإمام عبد بن حُميد في مسنده (٤) ؛ حدثني أبو بكر بن أبي شيبة (٥) ، حدثنا عليُّ بن مُسْهِر عن الأجْلَح -هو ابن عبد الله الكِنْدِي- عن الذَّيَّال بن حَرْمَلَة الأسَدِي، عن جابر بن عبد الله قال: اجتمع قريش يومًا فقالوا: انظروا أعلمَكم بالسِّحْر والكهانةِ والشعر، فَلْيأتِ هذا الرجل الذي (٦) فرَّق جماعتنا وشتَّتَ أمرنا، وعابَ ديننا فلْيُكلِّمْه ولينظرْ ماذا يردُّ عليه؟ فقالوا: ما نعلم أحدًا غيرَ عتبة بن ربيعة.
(١) في ح: وإنّ لفرعه، وفي دلائل النبوة: إن فرعه لجنًا. (٢) في ح: أعرف. (٣) كذا في ح، ط والدلائل، ولعل الصواب: فتقولون. (٤) ذكره ابن حجر في المطالب العالية (٤٢٨٥) وخرّجه بقوله: لأبي بكر وأبي يعلى وعبد بن حميد. اهـ، وفي الطبعة الجديدة بإسناده رقم (٤٢٢٩). وأخرجه أيضًا الحاكم في المستدرك (٢/ ٢٥٣) وقال: صحيح الإسناد ولم يخرجاه، وذكره الهيثمي في المجمع ٦/ ١٩، ٢٠ وقال رواه أبو يعلى وفيه الأجلح الكندي وثقه ابن معين وغيره وضعفه النسائي وغيره وبقية رجاله ثقات. (٥) في مصنفه (١٨٤٠٩) كتاب المغازي باب في أذى قريش للنبي ﷺ . (٦) في ح: الذي قد فرق، وليست هذه الزيادة في ط ولا في مصنف أبي بكر بن أبي شيبة.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies