Tafsīr al-FātiḥahIbn Rajab al-Hanbali

Chapter Five
Rulings Pertaining to al-Fatiha

One of these rulings is that its recitation during the prayer is a pillar of the prayer itself; without it, the prayer is, in principle, invalid. This is one of the two scholarly opinions. Al-Tirmidhi reported it from the majority of the Companions, including ʿUmar, Jabir, and ʿImran ibn Husayn (1). It is also the view held by most of the early generations, the jurists of the Hijaz, and the hadith scholars—such as Ibn ʿAwn, Ibn al-Mubarak, al-Awzaʿi, al-Shafiʿi, Ishaq, Abu Thawr, Dawud, and others. It is the sound position transmitted from Malik, and it is the school of Imam Ahmad as conveyed by the bulk of his leading students, unanimously embraced by all adherents of his madhhab.

The second opinion is that al-Fatiha is not one of the obligatory elements of the prayer; rather, the recitation of any other passage of the Quran generally suffices. This is the view of a group of the jurists of Iraq, then

(1) Jamiʿ al-Tirmidhi, vol. 1, p. 288, no. 247.
الفصل الخامس وهو: أحكامُ الفاتحة فمِن أحكامِها: أنَّ قراءتهَا في الصَّلاة رُكنٌ من أركان الصَّلاةِ، لا تَصِحُّ بدُونِها في الجُملة، وهذا القول أحدُ قولي العلماءِ، وحكاه التِّرمذيُّ عن أكثرِ الصَّحابَةِ، منهم: عمر وجابر وعمران بن حُصَين (١)، وهو قولُ أكثرِ السَّلفِ وفقهاءِ أهلِ الحجازِ وأهلِ الحديثِ كابنِ عَونٍ وابنِ المباركِ والأوزاعيِّ والشافعيِّ وإسحاقَ وأبي ثورٍ وداودَ، وغيرِهم، وهو الصَّحيحُ عن مالكٍ، وهو مَذهَبُ الإمامِ أحمدَ الذي نقلَه معظمُ أصحابِه الرُّواة عنه، وعليه أهلُ مَذهبِه قاطبةً. والقولُ الثاني: أنَّها ليست من فرُوض الصَّلاةِ، بل تجزئُ قراءةُ غيرِها في الجُملة، وهذا قولُ طائفةٍ من فقهاءِ العراق، ثم
(١) «جامع الترمذي» (١/ ٢٨٨ - رقم: ٢٤٧).

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies