Bayān Talbīs al-JahmiyyaIbn Taimiya

what was sought,” the slightest consideration has shown that not a single argument among them establishes the possibility of such a thing existing, whether in the mind or in external reality. I mean that he has established neither that reason knows that such a thing can be affirmed nor that it does not know it to be impossible. This would be so even if we held no belief ruling out its possibility through necessary knowledge or reasoning. How much more so, then, when its impossibility is known by necessity!

As previously explained, when something is held to be impossible on the basis of necessary knowledge, and someone wishes to show that neither necessary knowledge nor reasoning rules it out, but that it is mentally possible, he must demonstrate that what is known to be impossible through necessary knowledge or reasoning is not the same as that whose impossibility is unknown to the mind. Only then can mental possibility remain. Yet mental possibility does not entail possibility in external reality, as explained earlier.

المطلوب فقد تبين بأدنى نظر أنه ليس فيها وجه واحد يبين إمكان وجود ذلك لا الإمكان الذهني ولا الخارجي أعني لم يثبت أن العقل يعلم إثبات ذلك ولا أنه لا يعلم امتناعه ولو لم يكن عندنا اعتقاد ينفي إمكان ذلك بضرورة أو نظر فكيف إذا كان اعتقاد امتناع ذلك معلومًا بالضرورة وقد تقدم أن ما اعتقد امتناعه بالضرورة وأراد الرجل أن يبين أنه غير ممتنع بالضرورة ولا بالنظر بل هو ممكن في الذهن فلا بد أن يبين أن ما يعلم امتناعه بالضرورة أو النظر ليس هو الذي لا يعلم امتناعه في الذهن ليبقى الإمكان الذهني مع أن الإمكان الذهني لا يستلزم الإمكان الخارجي كما تقدم

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies