Bayān Talbīs al-JahmiyyaIbn Taimiya

‘This is the view of the majority of the early Quran commentators. Some scholars with a juristic orientation held that the two differ. They said: Exegesis brings something out of obscurity into clarity, whereas interpretation transfers speech from its original sense to a meaning whose establishment does not require evidence—evidence without which the apparent sense of the wording would not have been abandoned. The term derives from saying that something “came to such-and-such,” meaning that it reached that state.’”

Then he said concerning the verse in Āl ‘Imrān: He said, “There are two meanings of ‘interpretation’: the first is exegesis, and the second is the awaited outcome. ‘Firmly grounded’ means firmly established. Do those firmly grounded in knowledge know its interpretation or not? There are two views. The first is that they do not know it and that they believe in it. Tāwūs narrated from Ibn ‘Abbās that he recited: ‘And those firmly grounded in knowledge say, “We believe in it.”’ And to

وهذا قول جمهور المفسرين من المتقدمين وذهب قوم يميلون إلى الفقه إلى اختلافهما فقالوا التفسير إخراج الشيء من مقام الخفاء إلى مقام التجلي والتأويل نقل الكلام عن وضعه إلى ما لا يحتاج في إثباته إلى دليل لولاه ما ترك ظاهر اللفظ فهو مأخوذ من قولك آل الشيء إلى كذا أي صار إليه ثم قال في آية آل عمران قال وفي التأويل وجهان أحدهما أنه التفسير والثاني أنه العاقبة المنتظرة والراسخ الثابت فهل يعلم الراسخون تأويله أم لا فيه قولان أحدهما أنهم لا يعلمونه وأنهم آمنوا به وقد روى طاوس عن ابن عباس أنه قرأ ويقول الراسخون في العلم آمنا به وإلى

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies