Bayān Talbīs al-JahmiyyaIbn Taimiya

And according to al-Rāzī’s interpretation, the agent of burning is everything within reach of the servant’s sight among His creation, whereas according to Ibn Fūrak’s interpretation, the agent of burning is fire. The hadith explicitly refutes both interpretations.

Seventh, everything within reach of the servant’s sight cannot burn the splendours of his face, for he continually perceives things, yet they do not burn him. If what was intended were the burning of his heart and his loss of awareness of what he beholds, his face would not have been mentioned. Rather, he would have said, “It would burn his heart,” or something similar.

They said: “Allah cannot be veiled or concealed by a veil, because whatever is concealed by a veil must be smaller than that veil, and must therefore be finite, spatially aligned with it, and susceptible to contact.”

The Qādī said: “Know that one cannot affirm a veil of light before Allah in a sense implying enclosure, limitation, or spatial alignment, just as we have affirmed the possibility of seeing Him without enclosure or direction

وعلى قول الرازي جعل المُحرِق هو كل ما أدركه بصره من خلقه وعلى قول ابن فورك جعل المُحرِق هو النار والحديث نصٌّ في إبطال الاثنين جميعاً الوجه السابع أن كل ما أدركه بصر العبد يمتنع أن يحرق سبحات وجهه فإنه لا يزال يدرك أشياء وهي لا تحرقه ولو أريد احتراق قلبه وفناؤه عن المشاهدة لم يكن المذكور هو الوجه بل قال لأحرق قلبه ونحو ذلك قالوا لا يجوز أن يكون الله محتجباً ولا محجوباً بالحجاب لأن ما ستر بالحجاب فالحجاب أكبر منه ويكون متناهياً محاذياً جائزاً عليه المماسة فقال القاضي اعلم أنه ممتنع إطلاق حجاب هو نور من دون الله على وجه الإحاطة والحد والمحاذاة كما أجزنا رؤيته لا على وجه الإحاطة والجهة

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies