Bayān Talbīs al-JahmiyyaIbn Taimiya

the other.

Thirty-third point: By the unveiling of these veils, he must mean either their existence—in which case they already exist, yet this has not occurred—or their nonexistence. If they ceased to exist, knowledge of Allah through the veils themselves could only be inferior to knowledge of Allah, Mighty and Majestic, while they exist. The same applies, on his own principles, to seeing Him, since, in his view, such seeing has no connection with whether these veils exist or not. Thus, his interpretation of the statement, “If He unveiled these veils, the radiance of His Face would burn everything in His creation that His sight reaches,” is untenable on either assumption.

Thirty-fourth point: He said, “It would burn everything His sight reaches.” He did not restrict this to the human being who is incapable of beholding those perfections.

Thirty-fifth point: Regarding the statement in the authentic hadith, “His veil is light—or fire. If He removed it, the radiance of His Face would burn everything in His creation that His sight reaches,” the meaning of subuhāt (radiance) in the Arabic language has been explained. He said:

هذا الوجه الثالث والثلاثون أن كشف هذه الحجب إما أن يعني به وجودها فهي موجودة ولم يحصل هذا أو يراد به عدمها فإذا عدمت لم تكن معرفة الله بذاتها إلا دون معرفة الله عز وجَل مع وجودها وكذلك رؤيته على أصله إذ ليس للرؤية تعلق بوجود هذه ولا عدمها عنده وإذا كان كذلك علم أن تفسير قوله لو كشف هذه الحجب لأحرقت سبحات وجهه ما أدركه بصره من خلقه لا يصح على التقديرين الوجه الرابع والثلاثون أنه قال لأحرقت كل شيء أدركه بصره لم يخص بذلك الإنسان العاجز عن مطالعة تلك الكمالات الوجه الخامس والثلاثون أن قوله في الحديث الصحيح حجابه النور أو النار لو كشفه لأحرقت سبحات وجهه ما أدركه بصره من خلقه قد بينوا السبحات في لغة العرب قال

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies