light. Thus, what is ascribed is not identical to the One to whom it is ascribed.

Moreover, an equivalent consequence follows from their own interpretation. For if “the Light of the heavens and the earth” is interpreted as “the Guide,” “the One who sets things aright,” or “the Illuminator,” it would follow that one should say, “the example of His guide,” “the example of the one who sets Him aright,” or “the example of His illuminator.” This is plainly false. Rather, one would say, “the example of His guidance,” “the example of His setting things aright,” or “the example of His illumination.” Thus, in every case, what is designated by the ascribed “light” differs from what is designated by the “Light” to whom it is ascribed. It is therefore clear that this cannot serve as evidence either for departing from the verse’s apparent meaning or for the validity of that interpretation.