Bayān Talbīs al-JahmiyyaIbn Taimiya

It is well known that knowledge has its methods and means of apprehension, and that human beings possess internal and external faculties. A person senses and witnesses things, then imagines them, conceives of them, and grasps them with his intellect. He draws analogies between what he has not witnessed and what he has witnessed. What a person acquires through these means may be knowledge, or it may be conjecture rather than knowledge. What he says, believes, senses, and imagines may be true or false. Allah, Glorified and Exalted, has not distinguished between one kind of apprehension and another, between one means and another, or between internal and external faculties, accepting some and rejecting others. Rather, what He has rejected without qualification is speaking untruth and speaking without knowledge.

If certain kinds of apprehension or their methods were wholly invalid concerning Allah Most High, or if their judgments were unacceptable, then rejecting them outright would be obligatory, and prohibiting their acceptance without qualification would be imperative, unless the matter were known by some other means. Thus, concerning reports, He said:

“If an evildoer brings you news, verify it.” [al-Hujurāt: 6]

And concerning reasoning by comparison and sound analogy, He said:

“Indeed, Allah commands justice.” [al-Nahl: 90]

“And when you speak, be just.” [al-Anʿām: 152]

“Stand firm for Allah as witnesses in justice.” [al-Mā’idah: 8]

“So that people may uphold justice.” [al-Hadīd: 25]

Since some people's reports cannot be accepted on their sole authority, He commanded that their reports be verified. And since analogy and reasoning by comparison can involve injustice and transgression, by equating something with what is not its like according to revelation and reason, He commanded justice

ومن المعلوم أن العلم له طرق ومدارك وقوى باطنة وظاهرة في الإنسان، فإنه يحس الأشياء ويشهدها، ثم يتخيلها ويتوهمها ويضبطها بعقله، ويقيس ما غاب على ما شهد، والذي يناله الإنسان بهذه الأسباب قد يكون علمًا، وقد يكون ظنًا لا يعلمه، وما يقوله ويعتقده ويحسه ويتخيله، قد يكون حقًّا وقد يكون باطلًا. فالله سبحانه وتعالى لم يفرق بين إدراك وإدراك، ولا بين سبب وسبب، ولا بين القوى الباطنة والظاهرة فجعل بعض ذلك مقبولًا وبعضه مردودًا، بل جعل المردود هو قول غير الحق والقول بلا علم مطلقًا. فلو كان بعض أجناس الإدراك وطرقه باطلًا مطلقًا في حق الله تعالى، أو كان حكمه غير مقبول، كان رد ذلك مطلقًا واجبًا، والمنع من قبوله مطلقًا متعينًا إن لم يعلم بجهة أخرى، كما قال في الخبر: {إِن جَاءَكُمْ فَاسِقٌ بِنَبَإٍ فَتَبَيَّنُوا} [الحجرات: ٦] وقال في الاعتبار والقياس الصحيح {إِنَّ اللَّهَ يَأْمُرُ بِالْعَدْلِ} [النحل: ٩٠] {وَإِذَا قُلْتُمْ فَاعْدِلُوا} [الأنعام: ١٥٢] {كُونُوا قَوَّامِينَ لِلَّهِ شُهَدَاءَ بِالْقِسْطِ} [المائدة: ٨] {لِيَقُومَ النَّاسُ بِالْقِسْطِ} [الحديد: ٢٥] فلما كان من المخبرين من لا يقبل خبره إذا انفرد أمر بالتثبت في خبره، ولما كان القياس والاعتبار يحصل فيه الظلم والبغي، بتسوية الشيء بما ليس مثله في الشرع والعقل، أمر بالعدل

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies