16
and Ibrāhīm al-Nakha‘ī and al-Hasan al-Basrī were the leading Successors of their time. Compilers who included this hadith, such as Ibn Khuzaymah, have stated that reports of this kind, which establish knowledge, are weightier than reports that require action.
It is well known that if someone such as ‘Atā’ issued a ruling on a legal question on the basis of a report he transmitted with a disconnected chain, this would imply that he considered it established. This is why jurists regard a transmitter’s reliance on a report he transmits with a disconnected chain as evidence that he considers it established. Thus, if ‘Atā’ unequivocally attributed this exalted report to
وإبراهيم النخعي والحسن البصري أئمة التابعين في زمانهم وقد ذكر المصنف لهذا الحديث كابن خزيمة أن الأخبار في مثل هذا الجنس الذي توجب العلم هي أعظم من الأخبار التي توجب العمل ومعلوم أن مثل عطاء لو أفتى في مسألة فقه بموجب خبر أرسله لكان ذلك يقتضي ثبوته عنده ولهذا يجعل الفقهاء احتجاج المرسل بالخبر الذي أرسله دليلاً على ثبوته عنده فإذا كان عطاء قد جزم بهذا الخبر العلي عن