Bayān Talbīs al-JahmiyyaIbn Taimiya

with a u-vowel on the final t. He said: “This indicates that this meaning is affirmed of Allah Most High.”

He said: “Know that the interpretation is that wonder is a state that arises when something is regarded as momentous. Thus, when Allah attaches great importance to a matter or deed, whether through a great reward or a severe punishment, it is permissible to apply the term ‘wonder’ to Him.”

His statement here, “Wonder is a state that arises when something is regarded as momentous,” contradicts his statement shortly before this: “Wonder is a state that arises in a person through ignorance of the cause, and that is impossible for the Knower of the unseen and the seen.”

Can someone describe Allah as wondering, explain that this does not entail ignorance, and yet refuse to describe Him with an attribute

بضم التاء قال وذلك يدل على ثبوت هذا المعنى في حق الله تعالى قال واعلم أن التأويل هو أن العجب حالة تحصل عند استعظام الأمر فإذا عظم الله أمراً أو فعلاً إما في كثرة ثوابه أو في كثرة عقابه جاز إطلاق لفظ التعجب عليه فقوله في هذا الموضع التعجب حالة تحصل عند استعظام الأمر ينافي قوله قبل هذا بوجه التعجب حالة تحصل للإنسان عند الجهل بالسبب وذلك في حق عالم الغيب والشهادة محال فهل يوجد من يصف الله بالعجب ويبين أنه لا يستلزم الجهل ويمنع من وصفه بصفة

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies