16
and so it cannot serve as evidence for him.
If it is said: “Al-Khattābī and others have stated that there is agreement that this hadith is to be interpreted figuratively. Abū Sulaymān al-Khattābī said in his book Shi‘ār al-Dīn (The Emblem of Religion), discussing the degrees of the attributes: ‘Some of those who affirm the attributes went to excess in asserting their reality, reaching a form of likening Allah to His creation and portraying Him in their likeness, just as others went to excess in denying the attributes, reaching a form of nullification and negation. Both positions are mistaken and unsound, and the truth has
فلا يكون حجة له فإن قيل فقد ذكر الخطابي وغيره أن هذا الحديث مما يتأول بالاتفاق فقال أبو سليمان الخطابي في كتاب شعار الدين القول في مراتب الصفات أن قومًا من المثبتين للصفات أفرطوا في تحقيقها حتى خرجوا إلى ضرب التشبيه والتمثيل كما أفرط قوم في نفيها حتى صاروا إلى نوع من الإبطال والتعطيل وكلا القولين خطأ وخطل وللحق