Bayān Talbīs al-JahmiyyaIbn Taimiya

verses, as understood by those to whom they are addressed, contrary to their intended meaning, such that they may be said to have been interpreted away from their apparent meaning?

Their confusion arises only when they say, “A loan can only be for the borrower’s own need and benefit.” They are told: Grant that this is so in the case of created beings. Here, however, the loan is attributed to Allah, and the meaning is clear and readily understood: giving charity to His servants and spending in His cause. No one has ever understood this to mean that Allah Himself needs to benefit from a loan. At most, one might say that calling this a loan is metaphorical. Yet this metaphor is not the apparent meaning of the expression in its complete wording and construction, which make its meaning explicit, since the loan is attributed to Allah.

Do you not see that the Prophet’s statement (may Allah bless him and grant him peace) about Khālid, “He is one of the swords of

الآيات عند من يسمعها من المخاطبين خلاف ما أريد بها حتى يقال إنها متأولة وإنما تدخل الشبهة على هؤلاء بأن يقولوا القرض لايكون إلا لحاجة المقترض وانتفاعه هو به فيقال لهم هب أن الأمر كذلك في حق المخلوق فالقرض هنا مضاف إلى الله والمعنى ظاهر مفهوم وهو الصدقة على عباده والإنفاق في سبيله لم يظهر لأحد قط أن الله نفسه محتاج في نفسه إلى الانتفاع بالقرض فأكثر ما يقال إن تسمية هذا قرضًا مجاز لكن ليس هذا المجاز هو الظاهر من هذا اللفظ بعد التركيب والتأليف الذي يجعله نصًّا في معناه حيث أضيف القرض إلى الله ألا ترى أن قول النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم في خالد إنه سيف من سيوف

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies