Bayān Talbīs al-JahmiyyaIbn Taimiya

a loan is metaphorical. Yet an expression’s being metaphorical does not prevent it from conveying the apparent meaning of the discourse. For a metaphor accompanied by clarifying verbal indications is explicit in its meaning; the discourse has no apparent meaning other than that.

The discussion here is not about whether an expression is literal or metaphorical, or whether the Quran contains metaphor. That is a separate question, for which the evidence is many times greater than what he has cited. Rather, the point here concerns your claim that the various groups agree that some passages of the Quran and prophetic reports must be interpreted away from their apparent meanings, and that such interpretation means diverting speech from its apparent meaning to one contrary to it. But is the apparent meaning of these

قرضًا مجاز وكون اللفظ مجازًا لا يمنع أن يكون هو ظاهر الخطاب فإن المجاز المقرون بالقرائن اللفظية المبينة نص في معناه ليس للخطاب ظاهر إلا ذلك المعنى وليس الكلام هنا في كون اللفظ حقيقة أو مجازًا أو كون القرآن مشتملا على المجاز فإن هذه مسألة أخرى وشواهدها أضعاف ما ذكره وإنما المقصود هنا أن قولك إن الطوائف متفقة على وجوب التأويل في بعض ظواهر القرآن والأخبار والتأويل صرف الكلام عن ظاهره إلى ما يخالف ظاهره فهل ظاهر هذه

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies