Bayān Talbīs al-JahmiyyaIbn Taimiya

The fourteenth point concerns their specious claim of likeness between Allah and His creation. All the arguments of these Jahmiyyah in this matter hinge on likening Allah Most High to His creation. They say, for example: “If He had attributes, He would be like all other bodies that possess attributes. If He could be seen, what applies to all other visible things would also apply to Him. If He were a body, He would be like all other bodies, because bodies are alike.”

Every argument founded on likening Allah to His creation—whether that likeness is treated as real or merely hypothetical—is invalid, for no such likeness exists in reality, and this is self-evident. Thus, any argument that depends on this false likeness is itself invalid.

They liken Allah to other things in several ways:

First, they regard the attributes they affirm of Him on the basis of revelation as being like the attributes of created beings, and apply the same judgments in both cases. They then negate those attributes, thus both likening Him to creation and denying His attributes.

Second, through negations and privative descriptions that entail no attribute of perfection, they liken Him to nonexistent, deficient things.

Third, they hypothetically ascribe to Him what they deny of Him, and assume that, were He to possess it, He would be equal to others. This too is false.

الوجه الرابع عشر من شبههم ادعاء التماثل بين الله وخلقه أن هؤلاء الجهمية مدار جميع حججهم في هذا الباب على التمثيل بين الله تعالى وبين خلقه مثل قولهم لو كان له صفات لكان مثل سائر الموصوفين من الجسام ولو كان مرئيًّا لكان حكمه حكم سائر المرئيات ولو كان جسماً لكان مثلاً لسائر الأجسام لأن الأجسام متماثلة وكل حجة مبناها على التمثيل بين الله وبين خلقه تحقيقاً أو تقديراً فإنها حجة باطلة لأن هذا منتفٍ في نفس المر والعلم وبانتفائه ضروري فإذا كانت الحجة لا تتم إلا بهذه المماثلة الباطلة كانت باطلة وهم يستعملون التمثيل في حق الله من وجوه أحدها أنهم يجعلون ما يثبتون له من الصفات التي ورد بها الشرع مثل الثابتة للمخلوق ويحكمون عليه بما يحكمون على ذلك ثم ينفون بعد ذلك فيمثلون ويعطلون الثاني أنهم يمثلونه في السلوب والأمور العدمية التي لاتستلزم صفة كمال بالمعدومات الناقصات الثالث أن ما ينفونه عنه يقدرون ثبوته له وأنه إذا ثبت له كان مساوياً لغيره وهذا أيضاً باطل

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies