Bayān Talbīs al-JahmiyyaIbn Taimiya

it had not previously proceeded from it. If you have no syllogistic argument establishing this, an argument by analogy is even further out of reach. Thus, his judgment that the Necessary Existent brings nothing into being is entirely without knowledge: it is neither self-evident nor established by proof.

The source of the error of these polytheistic Sabians, the polytheistic Magians, and other kinds of polytheists is a false analogy that equates Allah with others and treats something other than Allah as His equal, rival, likeness, and peer. Sometimes they equate Him with existing beings that act through a will within them; at other times, they equate Him with existing things that act through a force within them, without life. These people are among those who have most cause to say:

“By Allah, we were indeed in manifest error {97} when we equated you with the Lord of all worlds. {98}”
[al-Shuʿarāʾ 97–98]

لم يكن صادرًا عنها وإن لم يكن لك على ذلك قياس شمول فقياس التمثيل أبعد وأبعد فتبين أن حكمه بأنه واجب الوجود لا يحدث شيئًا قول بلا علم أصلاً لا هو معلوم بنفسه ولا بحجة ومنشأ ضلالة هؤلاء المشركين الصابئين والمجوس المشركين وغيرهم من أصناف المشركين هو القياس الفاسد الذي مضمونه التسوية بين الله وبين غيره وأن يجعل غير الله عدلاً وندًّا ومثلاً وكفوًا فتارة يعدلونه بما وجوده مما له فعل بمشيئته فيه وتارة يعدلونه بما وجوده مما له فعل بقوة فيه بلا حياة وهؤلاء من أجدر الناس أن يقولوا تَاللَّهِ إِن كُنَّا لَفِي ضَلَالٍ مُّبِينٍ {٩٧} إِذْ نُسَوِّيكُم بِرَبِّ الْعَالَمِينَ {٩٨} [الشعراء ٩٧- ٩٨]

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies