Bayān Talbīs al-JahmiyyaIbn Taimiya

in the general sense. Thus, if excluding the species is impossible, excluding the genus is all the more impossible.

This is not the place to discuss these positions. Rather, we shall give a general answer: His being above the Throne is established by mass-transmitted scriptural evidence and the consensus of the early generations of this community. Reason also indicates, both self-evidently and through inference, that He is outside the world. Given this, either He must necessarily be in contact with it or separate from it, or neither is necessary. If either necessarily follows, it follows from the truth, and whatever necessarily follows from the truth is itself true.

His being in contact with the Throne or the like entails none of the objectionable implications involved in His being in contact with every created thing, including impurities, devils, and so forth. For we have only affirmed His transcendence above such contact because those things must be far removed from Him and because they are accursed and banished—not because contact is impossible for Him. Those grounds do not apply to His being in contact with the Throne or the like, as in the reports concerning His touching Adam and others. This is the answer given by the majority of hadith scholars and many speculative theologians.

If His being above the Throne does not necessarily entail His being either in contact with it or separate from it, then the objection has been answered. This answer is therefore decisive here, without any need to alter the correct position on this matter. And [as for] those who say that He is above the Throne, neither

العامة فإذا امتنع رفع النوع فامتناع رفع الجنس أولى وليس هذا موضع الكلام في هذه الأقوال ولكن نذكر جوابًا عامًّا فنقول كونه فوق العرش ثبت بالشرع المتواتر وإجماع سلف الأمة مع دلالة العقل ضرورة ونظرًا أنه خارج العالم فلا يخلو مع ذلك إما أن يلزم أن يكون مماسًّا أو مباينًا أو لا يلزم فإن لزم أحدهما كان ذلك لازمًا للحق ولازمُ الحق حق وليس في مماسته للعرش ونحوه محذور كما في مماسته لكل مخلوق من النجاسات والشياطين وغير ذلك فإن تنزيهه عن ذلك إنما أثبتناه لوجوب بُعدِ الأشياء عنه ولكونها ملعونة مطرودة لم نثبته لاستحالة المماسة عليه وتلك الأدلة منتفية في مماسته للعرش ونحوه كما روي في مس آدم وغيره وهذا جواب جمهور أهل الحديث وكثير من أهل الكلام وإن لم يلزم من كونه فوق العرش أن يكون مماسًّا أو مباينًا فقد اندفع السؤال فهذا الجواب هنا قاطع من غير حاجة إلى تغيير القول الصحيح في هذا المقام وبين من قاله إنه فوق العرش ليس

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies