Bayān Talbīs al-JahmiyyaIbn Taimiya

it would be attributable to the substrate, to the indwelling entity, or to a third entity. The first alternative is invalid, because bodies are alike in essence and in all their necessary concomitants, as explained previously. Thus, if any one of them necessitated Allah’s inhering in it, another would necessitate the same. This would entail the Creator’s inhering in all of them, which would entail either the division of His essence or one entity’s inhering in more than one substrate—both of which are impossible.

The second alternative is also invalid. If His necessitating this inherence were not conditional upon the substrate’s coming into existence, He would inhere in the substrate before it came into existence, which is impossible. If, however, it were conditional upon its coming into existence, then, when many substances came into existence, His inhering in any one of them would be no more warranted than His inhering in another. The impossibility already mentioned would therefore recur.

The third alternative is likewise invalid, for if that third entity were

يكون للمحل أو للحال أو الثالث والأول باطل لأن الأجسام متساوية في الماهية وجميع اللوازم على ما مرَّ فلو اقتضى شيء منها حلولِ الله فيه لاقتضى الآخر مثل ذلك فيلزم أن يحل الباري في كلها فيلزم إمّا انقسام ذاته أو حلول الواحد في أكثر من محل وأنهما محلان والثاني باطل أيضًا لأن اقتضاءِهُ للحلول إنْ لم يكن بشرط حدوث المحل كان حالاًّ في المحل قبل حدوث المحل وهذا محال وإن كان بشرط حدوثه فعند حدوث الجواهر الكثيرة لم يكن بأن يحل في واحدٍ منها أولى بأن يحل في غيره فيعاد المحال المذكور والثالث أيضًا باطل لأن ذلك الثالث إن كان

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies