Bayān Talbīs al-JahmiyyaIbn Taimiya

only.” He presented the argument in abbreviated form. Its substance is that the first alternative entails either His being divisible or a single entity occupying two spatial regions, while the second entails His being the size of an indivisible atom. This very argument has already been discussed in connection with denying that He occupies space.

“The second line of argument: If He inhered in a body, either it would be said that He had always inhered in it—which would entail either the eternity of the substrate or His having come into existence, exalted is He, both of which are impossible—or it would be said that He came to inhere in it after not inhering in it. In that case, either this would be necessary—in which case, that necessity—or else

واحد وساق الحجة مختصرة ومضمونها أن الأول يستلزم أن يكون منقسمًا أو يكون الواحد في حيزين والثاني يستلزم أن يكون بقدر الجوهر الفرد وقد تقدم الكلام على هذه الحجة بعينها في نفي التحيز المسلك الثاني لوحَلَّ في جسم فإمّا أن يقال إنّهُ أبدًا كان حالاًّ فيه فيلزم إمَّا قِدَمَ المحل أو حدوثه تعالى وهما باطلان أو يقال حلَّ بعد أن لم يكن حالاًّ فيه وحينئذٍ إما أن يكون واجبًا فذاك الوجوب وإما أن

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies