of the difference between what a living creature does on its own and what it asks of another. If, in their view, people’s supplication means nothing more than that they act on their own, then they would never be invoking Allah at all. Anyone who is not invoking Allah does not point toward Him in supplication; rather, doing so would be pointless. Indeed, even saying, “O Allah, do such-and-such,” would be pointless. This is the reality of their doctrine: to invalidate the various forms of supplication with which the messengers were sent, and to invalidate the disposition toward such supplication that Allah has instilled in His servants.
These people are the source of Jahmism and the negation of Allah’s attributes. Whoever agrees with them in any of this is among those who deny that Allah is the One who exists and is sought, invoked, and worshipped. Thus, you will find that most of those who deny that Allah is above the Throne display a corresponding degree of disengagement from invoking Allah, petitioning Him, and worshipping Him. The exception is someone who is ignorant of the reality of their doctrine, agreeing with them verbally on a statement whose true meaning he does not understand, while his innate disposition remains sound and intact. Such a person has both faith and hypocrisy within him. But if this doctrine takes hold of his heart, his innate disposition becomes corrupted.
When free to choose, these people turn away from invoking Allah and worshipping Him with sincere devotion, and they dispute concerning this. Yet when driven by necessity, they are as Allah Most High says:
“And among His signs are the ships sailing the sea like mountains. {32} If He wills, He stills the wind, leaving them motionless on its surface. Surely in this are signs for everyone steadfast and grateful. {33} Or He destroys them because of what they have earned—yet He pardons much—{34} and so that those who dispute concerning Our signs may know that they have no escape. {35}”
[al-Shūrā 32-35]
This is especially so according to the better-known of the two readings, namely the reading