Bayān Talbīs al-JahmiyyaIbn Taimiya

statement could conceive of this only as seeing something situated in a direction, and that anything else was neither known nor conceivable to them from the word “seeing”; yet the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, and the Companions and Successors who shared this consensus told people that they would see their Lord, without speaking of seeing Him without direction or using any expression conveying that meaning. Rather, he said, “Just as you see the sun and the moon,” thus likening seeing Him to seeing something situated in a direction. It follows of necessity that the seeing indicated by the texts transmitted from the Messenger and the consensus of the earliest Muslims is the seeing familiar to people, namely, seeing something situated in a direction. This is clear.

Moreover, he has stated that seeing something that is not situated in a direction is called apprehension, and that when the term “apprehension” means seeing, it denotes a particular kind of seeing: seeing something finite that is situated in a direction. As for something not situated in a direction, seeing it is not called apprehension. Accordingly, the words of the Exalted, “Vision does not apprehend Him,” mean that vision does not encompass Him as something finite, nor apprehend Him as finite and bounded.

What he has said here is sound, although he has not fully developed its proof, for this is how the leading scholars of the early generations explained the verse. What the Muʿtazilah report from Ibn ʿAbbās—that he interpreted the verse as denying seeing—is falsely attributed to Ibn ʿAbbās. Rather, it is established through mass-transmitted reports from him that he affirmed seeing

الكلام لم يكونوا يتصورون من ذلك إلا رؤية ما كان في الجهة وأن ما سوى ذلك لم يكن معلوماً ولا متصوراً لهم من لفظ الرؤية ومع هذا فالنبي صلى الله عليه وسلم وأهل الإجماع من الصحابة والتابعين أخبروا الخلق بأنهم يرون ربهم ولم يقولوا برؤية في غير جهة ولا ما يؤدي هذا المعنى بل قال كما ترون الشمس والقمر فمثل رؤيته بالرؤية لما هو في جهة علم بالاضطرار أن الرؤية التي تدل عليها نصوص الرسول وإجماع السابقين هي الرؤية التي كان الناس يعرفونها وهي لما يكون في الجهة وهذا بين وأيضاً فقد أخبر أن ما لا يكون في جهة تسمى رؤيته إدراكاً وأن لفظ الإدراك إذا أريد به الرؤية فهي رؤية مخصوصة وهي رؤية المتناهي الذي يكون في جهة فأما الشيء الذي لا يكون في جهة فلا تسمى رؤيته إدراكاً وإذا كان كذلك فيكون قوله تعالى لاَّ تُدْرِكُهُ الأَبْصَارُ أي متناهياً لا تحيط به ولا تدركه متناهياً محدوداً وهذا الذي ذكره جيد وإن كان لم يستوف حجته فإن أئمة السلف بهذا فسروا الآية وما ذكرته المعتزلة عن ابن عباس أنه تأول الآية على نفي الرؤية كذب على ابن عباس بل قد ثبت عنه بالتواتر أنه كان يثبت رؤية

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies