Bayān Talbīs al-JahmiyyaIbn Taimiya

and Abū al-Hasan al-Tabarī, Abū al-‘Abbās al-Qalānisī, and others—as his position and those of others will be related below, Allah willing—and Judge Abū Bakr ibn al-Bāqillānī, Abū ‘Alī ibn Shādhān, and others. They all affirm Allah’s elevation above the Throne and His rising over it specifically, rather than over anything else. They regard as misguided those who interpret this as dominion, subjugation, or the like, as illustrated by some of their statements that we have already quoted in the response to the request for a fatwa and in the response to these questions put to him.

We also noted that Abū al-Hasan al-Ash‘arī stated that this was the position of all the people of the Sunnah and hadith. Al-Rāzī likewise says that this is their position, and he too has attributed it in his books to some of the leading scholars of his school. He also attributed two positions to al-Ash‘arī himself, and we have discussed this. How, then, can he claim that his opponents are only

وأبي الحسن الطبري، وأبي العباس القلانسي، وغيره -كما سيأتي إن شاء الله حكاية قوله وقول غيره- والقاضي أبي بكر بن الباقلاني، وأبي علي بن شاذان وغيرهم، كلهم يقولون: بإثبات العلو لله على العرش واستوائه عليه دون ما سواه، ويضللون من يفسر ذلك بالاستيلاء والقهر ونحوه - كما قد حكينا بعض أقوالهم في جواب الاستفتاء، وفي جواب هذه المسائل الموردة عليه وذكرنا أنَّ أبا الحسن الأشعري ذكر أن هذا قول جميع أهل السنة والحديث، وبه يقول الرازي وهو قد حكى أيضًا في كتبه ذلك عن بعض أئمة أصحابه، وذكر للأشعري نفسه قولين، وقد تكلمنا على ذلك. فكيف يزعم أن خصومه إنما هم

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies