Bayān Talbīs al-JahmiyyaIbn Taimiya

the first is that His occupying that particular spatial locus is merely a relation and a connection. If all rational people agree that relations and connections between Him and existing things may newly arise and cease, then such relations may all the more arise and cease with respect to what is merely a notional determination of place.

The second is to say that this entails, at most, movement, which is possible, as previously discussed concerning their statements that He rose over the Throne after not having been established over it, that He will come on the Day of Resurrection, that He will arrive, and the like.

أحدهما أن اختصاصه بذلك الحيز المعين مجرد نسبة وإضافة وإذا كان تجدد النسب والإضافات له وزوالها من الأمور الموجودة جائز باتفاق العقلاء فحدوث هذه النسب وزوالها عما هو تقدير المكان بطريق الأولى والأحرى الثاني أن يقال أكثر ما في ذلك الحركة وهذا جائز كما تقدم في قولهم استوى على العرش بعد أن لم يكن مستوياً عليه وأنه يجيء يوم القيامة ويأتي ونحو ذلك

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies