Bayān Talbīs al-JahmiyyaIbn Taimiya

and others. The general tenor of the early generations’ statements supports this. This is connected with the question of newly occurring events subsisting in Him. He has stated that no rational proofs rule out newly occurring events subsisting in Him, and that all groups are logically bound to affirm this. Accordingly, it would not be impossible for Him to rise over the Throne after not having risen over it. Since, on either view, it is not impossible for Him to come to be above the Throne, even though in pre-eternity there was no throne for Allah to be above, this refutes his claim that if the Creator’s occupying a particular spatial locus is temporally originated, then He was not in a spatial locus in pre-eternity, and that it is impossible for something of this kind to become

وغيرهم وعامة كلام السلف يدل على هذا وهذا متصل بمسألة حلول الحوادث به وهو قد ذكر أنه ليس في الأدلة العقلية ما ينفي حلول الحوادث به وذكر أن الطوائف جميعهم يلزمهم القول به وإذا كان كذلك لم يمتنع أن يستوي عليه بعد أن لم يكن مستوياً وإذا كان على القولين لا يمتنع أن يصير فوق العرش وإن لم يكن في الأزل عرش يكون الله فوقه بطل ما ادعاه من أنه إذا كان اختصاص الباري بالحيز محدثاً فهو إذاً في الأزل ما كان حاصلاً في الحيز والشيء الذي يكون كذلك استحال أن يصير

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies